Jack in the Box, Inc. (JACK)
NASDAQConsumer DiscretionaryRestaurantsSnapshot 2026-10-29
$13.03+9.40%
Close 2026-10-29 · 1-day change
NASDAQConsumer DiscretionaryRestaurantsSnapshot 2026-10-29
Research Workspace
Put JACK beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Restaurants is in steady. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
Management is running behind on a stated commitment.
View ThesisMiddle-of-the-pack management execution.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is highly volatile — it swings about 2% on a typical day and fell roughly 60% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskJACK’s case rests on strong recent performance, though its latest revenue declined year over year. The latest quarter beat earnings consensus, despite revenue falling year over year. JACK trades at 4× earnings versus a 16× peer median. That gap suggests low expectations, though no priced-in assessment is available. The risk is management’s missed commitment and execution of its restaurant-closure plan. Our model puts the next-quarter miss probability near 31%. Peer multiples imply a price about 0% above where it trades; this read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-10-29. JACK is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 16 analysts currently covering JACK (as of Oct 2026).
Based on 5 Wall Street analysts offering 12-month price targets for JACK in the last 4 months.
Continue this research
Compare JACK with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JACK Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across our valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-29. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No fair value published
Our valuation methods disagree too much on this name right now. Rather than print a number we don't believe, we're holding it back until they converge.
This applies to all three horizons. The trailing multiples, peer comparison, and quality and trajectory reads on this page are unaffected. Names move in and out of this state day to day as the methods converge or diverge. Method agreement on this name is low.
Around the middle on quality vs scored peers
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Restaurants — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Our valuation methods disagree too much on this name right now. Rather than print a number we don't believe, we're holding it back until they converge.
Our valuation methods disagree too much on this name right now. Rather than print a number we don't believe, we're holding it back until they converge.
Compare the value case
Put JACK next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
New board member enhances leadership and strategic direction.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-10-29. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
Current $13.03
The last 12 months of price, then the range of analyst 12-month targets from today’s $13.03.
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
Threatens: Execute 'JACK on Track' plan including restaurant closures
Potential closures could hinder 'JACK on Track' plan execution.
Indicates increased interest and potential for growth.
Advances: Strengthen franchisee profitability and improve execution
Improves franchisee profitability and execution through technology.
Advances: Strengthen franchisee profitability and improve execution
New marketing strategy could enhance franchisee profitability.
Advances: Strengthen franchisee profitability and improve execution
New marketing strategy could enhance franchisee profitability.
Threatens: Execute 'JACK on Track' plan including restaurant closures
Restaurant closures may hinder growth objectives.
New CEO may enhance execution of growth strategies.
