Reading TXRH? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TXRH free→Reading TXRH? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TXRH free→
NASDAQConsumer DiscretionaryRestaurantsSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality and management's track record are neutral. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, although TXRH is performing above typical compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 28% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, priced roughly in line with peer multiples. This assessment hinges on guidance changes and sector trends, particularly the performance of major players like MCD and SBUX. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $168.23. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $168 the market pays 27× p/e — above the 21× p/e peer median but in line with its own 27× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $131 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $165–$210. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 28% near-term growth, ahead of our forecast of about 11%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated strong grew net income 70% of the time over the next year (vs 53% for the rest of the cohort, n=2844).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.77x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=3229).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.73 → $1.81 (+4.6% / 30d). 23 raised, 2 cut, 26 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 3 maintained. 50% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 0.3% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$133.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$245.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,961.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The earnings report will clarify if the recent earnings miss was a one-time issue or a trend.
Confirms one read:Q2 earnings beat analyst expectations by more than 5%.
Confirms the other:Q2 earnings miss analyst expectations by more than 5%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for TXRH yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
and the Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such information will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated by reference. 2 SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the S…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$165.00 – $210.00 (median $190.00) · 16 analysts · as of 2026-05-21
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Restaurants.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
TXRH Texas Roadhouse | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 78 of 100 | full | moderate |
MCD McDonald's | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | full | moderate |
SBUX Starbucks | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 42 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
YUM Yum! Brands | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | full | moderate |
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 58 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
5 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=646).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue through menu pricing actions and store week growth.
Not yet measured, building a track record across disclosures.
Enhance operating income through cost management and efficiency improvements.
Maintain a focus on returning value to shareholders through increased dividends.
Why it matters: This growth rate shows how well Texas Roadhouse is attracting customers. A lower rate may signal weakening demand.
Confirms:Comparable restaurant sales growth below 6.5% for the first five weeks of Q2 2026.
Disproves:Restaurant sales growth is 6.5% or higher.
Why it matters: Earnings per share shows how profitable a company is. A lower EPS may mean problems.
Confirms:Diluted EPS reported below $1.87 for Q2 2026.
Disproves:Diluted EPS meets or exceeds $1.87.
Why it matters: Better operating income means Texas Roadhouse is controlling costs. This is key for making money.
Confirms:Operating income increases by more than 10% compared to last year.
Disproves:Operating income increases by less than 10% compared to last year.
Why it matters: Improving revenue growth would show Texas Roadhouse is overcoming recent challenges. This is key for future growth.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth exceeds 4% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth stays below 4% year over year.
Why it matters: Confirming the dividend shows Texas Roadhouse wants to give value to shareholders.
Confirms one read:The dividend of $0.75 per share is paid on June 30, 2026.
Confirms the other:The dividend payment is cut or stopped.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth could signal a slowdown in business momentum. This could impact future expectations.
Confirms:Revenue growth in Q2 2026 is below 5% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth in Q2 2026 is above 5% year over year.
OTHER EVENTS On May 6, 2026, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the payment of a quarterly cash dividend of $0.75 per share of common stock. This payment will be distributed on June 30, 2026, to shareholders of record at the close of business on June 2, 2026.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. (d) On March 5, 2026, the Board of Directors (the “ Board ”) of Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (the “ Company ”), appointed Elizabeth K. Ingram to the Board. Ms. Ingram, age 55, was appointed to the Board because of her chief executive and board of directors experience as well as her extensive knowledge of the restaurant industry and marketing background. M…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. (e) In connection with Keith Humpich’s prior appointment to interim Chief Financial Officer on June 9, 2025, the talent management and compensation committee of the Company’s Board of Directors agreed that he would receive a $100,000 stipend per fiscal quarter (or portion thereto) in which he serves in such position, which amount will be paid in…
and the Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such information will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated by reference. 2 SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the S…