Reading LESL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LESL free→Reading LESL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LESL free→
NASDAQConsumer DiscretionarySpecialty RetailSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak. Earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company is unprofitable. Management's recent track record has been steady. Risk is high, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, LESL trades below typical levels. Peer multiples imply a price about 80% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk. This pattern occurs because recent financials are weak and earnings quality is fragile. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $7.19. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $7.19 LESL trades at 0× p/s, below its 1× p/s peer median. Our $36 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 80% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -12%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
No fragility gates fired.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated weak grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=2844).
Over the trailing year it converted -0.10x of net income into operating cash flow.
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the broad stock market, the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
8 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=646).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $5.03 → $5.06 (+0.8% / 30d). 1 raised, 1 cut, 3 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 33% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$561.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$1,207.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $9,284.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Retail sales data can show how consumers are spending. This affects Leslie's business.
Confirms one read:Retail sales data shows an increase month over month.
Confirms the other:Retail sales data shows a decrease month over month.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for LESL yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this report, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The information and the accompanying exhibit shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission made by the Company, except as shall be expressly s…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Other Specialty Retail.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
LESL Leslie's Inc | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 12 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
ULTA Ulta Beauty | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 97 of 100 | fair | moderate |
TSCO Tractor Supply | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 58 of 100 | fair | elevated |
CHWY Chewy | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 99 of 100 | fair | elevated |
BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 99 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management has set revenue guidance for FY 2026 between $1,100 million and $1,250 million.
Stated in 3 of last 3 quarters. Revenue for 2026-Q2 was $184.7 million, down from $389.2 million in 2025-Q4, indicating a challenging trajectory towards the guidance range of $1,100 million to $1,250 million for FY 2026. Persistent statement, limited substantive delivery this quarter.
“Sales $1,100 million to $1,250 million.”
“Sales $1,100 million to $1,250 million.”
“Sales $1,100 million to $1,250 million.”
Management has set capital expenditures guidance for FY 2026 between $20 million and $25 million.
Stated in 3 of last 3 quarters. The company has consistently guided capital expenditures between $20 million and $25 million for FY 2026. However, the financials do not provide specific capex figures for recent quarters, making it difficult to assess delivery against this target.
“Capital Expenditures $20 million to $25 million.”
Management has set adjusted EBITDA guidance for FY 2026 between $55 million and $75 million.
Stated in 3 of last 3 quarters. The company has set an adjusted EBITDA guidance range of $55 million to $75 million for FY 2026. However, with operating income at -$37.7 million in 2026-Q2, achieving this target appears challenging, indicating limited progress.
“Adjusted EBITDA $55 million to $75 million.”
Why it matters: Positive revenue growth may show that Leslie's sales are getting better.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported as positive year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported as negative year over year.
of this report, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The information and the accompanying exhibit shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission made by the Company, except as shall be expressly s…
Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant. After conducting a competitive process, on January 27, 2026, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) of Leslie’s, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”) as the new independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for the fiscal year ending October 3, 2026. In addition, on January 27, 2026, the Audit Committee approved the dismissal of Ernst & Young LLP (“EY…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On January 6, 2026, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Leslie’s, Inc. (the “Company”) increased the size of the Board from eight to nine members and appointed John Hartmann to the Board, effective January 7, 2026. Mr. Hartmann was designated as a Class III director and will stand for election at the Company’s 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholder…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On December 2, 2025 Leslie’s, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year ended October 4, 2025 and furnished the press release on a Current Report on Form 8-K (the “Original Form 8-K”). This Current Report on Form 8-K/A amends the Original Form 8-K solely for the purpose of correcting an immaterial error with respect to the Company’s calculation of basic and diluted loss per…
“Capital Expenditures $20 million to $25 million.”
“Capital Expenditures $20 million to $25 million.”
“Adjusted EBITDA $55 million to $75 million.”
“Adjusted EBITDA $55 million to $75 million.”