Goodyear Tire & Rubber (GT)
NASDAQConsumer DiscretionaryAuto - PartsSnapshot 2026-10-29
$4.43+0.45%
Close 2026-10-29 · 1-day change
NASDAQConsumer DiscretionaryAuto - PartsSnapshot 2026-10-29
Research Workspace
Put GT beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Consumer Discretionary is in steady. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
Primary pillar under pressure — Strengthen cost structure to improve operating income: Direct metric needs a verified mapping.
View ThesisRevenue is contracting — down about 4% over the past year.
View GrowthManagement screens weak on capital allocation, earnings delivery, the balance sheet, market reaction to earnings.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is volatile — it swings about 2% on a typical day and fell roughly 61% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskGT’s case rests on cost restructuring lifting operating income, despite weak recent performance. Revenue decline eased from 6.9% to 4.8%, while the latest quarter missed. GT trades at 0.1× sales versus 0.8× for peers, and expectations look modest versus our view. The cost-structure pillar is under pressure, though its metric mapping needs verification. Our model puts the next-quarter miss probability near 42%. Peer multiples imply a price about 57% above where it trades. The thesis is on watch; this read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-10-29. GT is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 10 analysts currently covering GT (as of Oct 2026).
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
Continue this research
Compare GT with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GT Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-29. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Consumer Discretionary (broad) — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Our valuation methods disagree too much on this name right now. Rather than print a number we don't believe, we're holding it back until they converge.
Compare the value case
Put GT next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Threatens: Strengthen cost structure and manufacturing footprint
Cash burn indicates struggles in strengthening cost structure.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-10-29. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Bottom 25% on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
Threatens: Strengthen cost structure and manufacturing footprint
Turnaround plan indicates ongoing cash burn affecting cost structure.
Advances: Strengthen cost structure and manufacturing footprint
Contract ratification strengthens labor relations and cost structure.
Advances: Strengthen cost structure and manufacturing footprint
Plant closure significantly reduces costs and improves footprint.
Threatens: Strengthen cost structure and manufacturing footprint
Intentional loss raises concerns about cost management.
Threatens: Drive growth through Goodyear Forward benefits and brand value
Earnings miss indicates pressure on growth and brand value.
Threatens: Strengthen cost structure and manufacturing footprint
Margin pressure impacts cost structure and growth objectives.
Second quarter loss raises concerns about growth potential.