Reading MAT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MAT free→Reading MAT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MAT free→
NASDAQConsumer DiscretionaryLeisureSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is fragile, indicating that reported profits are not well supported by cash. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, while risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop presents a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 11% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. Key factors to watch include any guidance cuts from MAT and the performance of sector bellwethers like HAS, LTH, and GOLF. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $14.35. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $14 MAT trades at 11× p/e, below its 15× p/e peer median. Our $17 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Analysts: $18–$28. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 16% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 1%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 48% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=3804).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.09x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated fragile grew net income 45% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2427).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.06 → $0.06 (-6.2% / 30d). 0 raised, 0 cut, 13 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 56% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$104.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$311.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,646.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
risk label changed from 'moderate' to 'elevated'.
Risk rose, changing from a moderate to an elevated label. The sector backdrop remains a headwind, indicating challenges in the environment. The valuation is described as cheap, but there are signs of weakening in recent financials or earnings quality.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Growth above 3% would signal strong demand and support Mattel's revenue growth focus.
Confirms:Q2 2026 net sales growth exceeds 3% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 2026 net sales growth is below 3% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for MAT yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Mattel, Inc. (the "Company" or "Mattel") held its 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 28, 2026 (the "Annual Meeting"). As reported below, at the Annual Meeting, the Company's stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of the Mattel, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Equity and Long-Term Compensation Plan (the "2026 Restatement"). The 2…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$18.00 – $28.00 (median $18.00) · 3 analysts · as of 2026-04-30
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Leisure Products.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
MAT Mattel | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 64 of 100 | fair | elevated |
HAS Hasbro | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 69 of 100 | fair | moderate |
GOLF Acushnet Company | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 70 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
BC Brunswick | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 23 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
PII Polaris | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 41 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=646).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Mattel aims to drive revenue growth through increased sales and strategic investments.
Mattel is focused on improving cash flow from operations through strategic investments and cost management.
Mattel aims to improve operating income through cost management and strategic initiatives.
Why it matters: Successful game launches may increase digital revenue. They can also prove the digital strategy.
Confirms:Users are very engaged. Revenue is high from the two self-published mobile games.
Disproves:Users are not engaged. Revenue is low from the two self-published mobile games.
Why it matters: A drop in sector revenue growth could impact Mattel's performance. It signals broader challenges.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth reported below its median.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above its median.
Why it matters: A better gross margin shows improved cost control and stronger pricing power.
Confirms:Q2 2026 gross margin improves from 44.9% reported in Q1 2026.
Disproves:Q2 2026 gross margin declines further from 44.9% reported in Q1 2026.
Why it matters: Luthra's leadership may change how Mattel sells products and boost results.
Confirms one read:Sales growth speeds up under Luthra's leadership after May 1, 2026.
Confirms the other:Sales growth stops or falls under Luthra's leadership after May 1, 2026.
Why it matters: Better operating income is important for Mattel's profits. Any gain shows progress.
Confirms:Operating income improves from -$102.68M in Q1 to above -$50M in Q2.
Disproves:Operating income worsens or remains below -$100M in Q2.
Why it matters: The movie's success can help people notice the brand. It can also boost sales of related items.
Confirms:Good box office results came after the June 5, 2026 release.
Disproves:Box office results are much lower than expected.
Why it matters: Positive cash flow is vital for Mattel's financial health. It shows better cash management.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations reported above $0 in Q2.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations remains negative in Q2.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 29, 2026, Mattel, Inc. (“Mattel”) issued a press release regarding its first quarter 2026 financial results, a copy of which is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 hereto. This exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act o…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On April 7, 2026, Mattel, Inc. (the “Company”) announced that, effective May 1, 2026, Steve Totzke will cease to serve as President and Chief Commercial Officer and Sanjay Luthra, Executive Vice President and Managing Director of EMEA and Global Direct-to-Consumer, will succeed Mr. Totzke as Chief Commercial Officer, overseeing Mattel’s global sale…
above, the Company also announced that Mattel’s Board of Directors has authorized the Company to repurchase $1.5 billion of the Company’s shares. In accordance with General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be incorpora…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On October 21, 2025, Mattel, Inc. (“Mattel”) issued a press release regarding its third quarter 2025 financial results, a copy of which is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 hereto. This exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act…