Reading WTW? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track WTW free→Reading WTW? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track WTW free→NASDAQFinancialsInsurance BrokersSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been fairly steady. Earnings quality is mixed, and the company has a capital-unfriendly stance. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, while compared with sector peers, it is typical. Peer multiples imply a price roughly in line with where it trades (about fair); the read is fair. If WTW cuts guidance on the next call, that's a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $257.85. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $258 WTW trades at 15× p/e, in line with its 14× p/e peer median. Our $257 fair value reflects that, medium confidence. Analysts: $275–$374. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 0% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 1%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated strong grew net income 67% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3733).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.08x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=4725).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, the broad stock market, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
7 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=5004).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $3.12 → $3.11 (-0.2% / 30d). 1 raised, 14 cut, 19 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 71% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 44.9% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$103.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$232.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,039.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If organic growth is below 3%, it shows challenges in keeping momentum.
Confirms:Organic revenue growth reported for Q2 2026 is less than 3%.
Disproves:Organic revenue growth for Q2 2026 is 3% or higher.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Acquisition aligns with growth and strategic objectives.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
No upside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
No downside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 30, 2026, Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (“WTW”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the period ended March 31, 2026. A copy of WTW’s press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated by reference herein. A reconciliation between certain non-GAAP financial measures and reported financial results is provided as an attachment to the press release.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$275.00 – $374.00 (median $339.00) · 12 analysts · as of 2026-06-09
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Insurance Brokers.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
WTW Willis Towers Watson | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 39 of 100 | fair | moderate |
MRSH Marsh McLennan | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | full | moderate |
AON Aon plc | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 68 of 100 | full | moderate |
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 73 of 100 | full | moderate |
BRO Brown & Brown | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | fair | elevated |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
WTW plans to repurchase $1.0B or more in shares, subject to market conditions and capital allocation opportunities.
WTW aims to meet its full-year financial targets, emphasizing strategic investments and operational efficiency.
WTW targets mid-single digit organic revenue growth, leveraging strategic investments and market momentum.
Why it matters: Closing the acquisition will expand WTW's presence in the U.S. middle market. It could enhance growth in high-growth sectors like technology and life sciences.
Confirms:The deal will close in Q1 2026. All regulatory approvals are in place.
Disproves:The deal may not close. This could be due to regulatory issues or other problems.
Why it matters: Adjusted EPS shows how profitable a company is. If it drops below $3.50, it raises concerns.
Confirms:Adjusted diluted EPS was below $3.50 for Q2 2026.
Disproves:Adjusted diluted EPS remains at or above $3.50 for Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Doing the plan well could lead to big savings and more money.
Confirms:Updates show progress towards $300 million in cost savings by the end of 2024.
Disproves:Reports show delays or problems in reaching the cost savings goal.
Why it matters: A big boost from foreign currency could improve earnings and help with other issues.
Confirms:Foreign currency impact adds more than $0.10 to adjusted EPS for Q2 2026.
Disproves:Foreign currency impact adds less than $0.10 to adjusted EPS for Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Hitting this growth target shows WTW is successfully executing its plans.
Confirms:Organic revenue growth reported at 5% or more in the next earnings release.
Disproves:Organic revenue growth reported below 3% in the next earnings release.
Why it matters: Earnings in Q2 could show ongoing strength and good strategy.
Confirms:Q2 2026 diluted EPS is equal to or greater than $3.10.
Disproves:Q2 2026 diluted EPS falls below $3.10.
Why it matters: Operating margin shows how well a company runs. If it drops below 22%, it may face problems.
Confirms:The adjusted operating margin was under 22% for Q2 2026.
Disproves:The adjusted operating margin was over 22% for Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Share buybacks can increase earnings per share. They also show that management trusts the company.
Confirms:Announced share repurchases of $1.0B or more in 2026.
Disproves:Share repurchases fall below $1.0B in 2026.
Why it matters: Share buybacks show that management believes in the company's value. They can help EPS grow.
Confirms:WTW announces share repurchases of $1.0B or more in 2026.
Disproves:WTW fails to initiate share repurchases of at least $1.0B in 2026.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On January 7, 2026, Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (“WTW”), together with its wholly owned subsidiary, Trinity Acquisition plc, a limited company formed under the laws of England and Wales (“TA”) and TA’s indirect wholly owned subsidiary, Willis North America Inc., a Delaware corporation (“WNA” and together with TA, the “Borrowers”) entered into a $775,000,000 delayed draw term loan facility (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information set forth in
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On December 22, 2025, Willis North America Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Issuer”), completed an offering of (i) $700,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Issuer’s 4.550% Senior Notes due 2031 (the “2031 Notes”) and (ii) $300,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Issuer’s 5.150% Senior Notes due 2036 (the “2036 Notes” and together with the 2031 Notes, the “Notes”). The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Willis Towers Wats…
Other Events. On December 15, 2025, Willis North America Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Issuer”), priced an offering of $700,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Issuer’s 4.550% Senior Notes due 2031 (the “2031 Notes”) and $300,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Issuer’s 5.150% Senior Notes due 2036 (the “2036 Notes” and together with the 2031 Notes, the “Notes”). The Notes will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company, an Irish pu…