Reading GSHD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GSHD free→Reading GSHD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GSHD free→
NASDAQFinancialsInsurance BrokersSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, but the capital stance is capital unfriendly, indicating less shareholder-friendly actions. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact future performance. Peer multiples imply a price about 6% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $36.05. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $36 the market pays 20× p/e — above the 12× p/e peer median but in line with its own 59× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $29 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $52–$90. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 25% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 17%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 3.26x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated robust grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the broad stock market, the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
5 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=5004).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.52 → $0.51 (-0.5% / 30d). 4 raised, 6 cut, 12 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 46% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 54.1% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$288.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$651.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $6,742.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Confidence changed from 'medium' to 'high'.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: More policies in force show strong customer loyalty and growth for Goosehead.
Confirms:Policies in force increase over 14% year over year.
Disproves:Policies in force increase less than 14% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for GSHD yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
No upside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
No downside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On April 22, 2026, Goosehead Insurance, Inc. (the “Company”) announced that John Martin was appointed as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) effective April 20, 2026. Mr. Martin brings extensive experience in finance, capital markets, and strategic leadership. Since November 2021, he served as CFO of RugsUSA, a private equity-backed e-com…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$52.00 – $90.00 (median $67.00) · 12 analysts · as of 2026-06-09
Looks more expensive than peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2024-Q3, 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Insurance Brokers.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
GSHD Goosehead Insurance, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 70 of 100 | full | elevated |
MRSH Marsh McLennan | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | full | moderate |
AON Aon plc | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 68 of 100 | full | moderate |
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 73 of 100 | full | moderate |
WTW Willis Towers Watson | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 39 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on achieving organic revenue growth between 10% and 19% for 2026.
Continue efforts to improve operating income through strategic initiatives.
Focus on improving cash flow from operations to support business growth.
Why it matters: If growth falls below 12%, it may signal weakening demand for insurance products.
Confirms:Total written premiums growth reported below 12% year over year.
Disproves:Total written premiums growth remains at or above 12% year over year.
Why it matters: A drop means costs are rising or there are inefficiencies. This affects profits and investor feelings.
Confirms:EBITDA margin is below 25%.
Disproves:EBITDA margin is above 25%.
Why it matters: A decline would indicate weakening demand for Goosehead's insurance products. This could hurt future revenue growth.
Confirms:Policies in force growth reported below 10% year over year.
Disproves:Policies in force growth reported above 10% year over year.
Why it matters: John Martin's plans may change financial strategy and operations. This is important after his new role.
Confirms one read:A press release shares new plans from the CFO.
Confirms the other:No updates or changes in strategy will be announced in the next quarter.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth shows possible problems in Goosehead's business.
Confirms:Q2 total revenue growth reported below 10% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 total revenue growth reported above 10% year over year.
Why it matters: More cash flow helps growth plans and shows financial strength. It matches management's goals.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations reported above $25M.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations reported below $22M.
99.2 Press Release issued by Goosehead Insurance, Inc. dated April 22, 2026 104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (Formatted as Inline XBRL) Date: April 22, 2026 EXHIBIT INDEX No. Description 99.1 Press Release issued by Goosehead Insurance, Inc. on April 22, 2026 99.2 Press Release issued by Goosehead Insurance, Inc. on April 22, 2026 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the und…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. As previously disclosed by Goosehead Insurance, Inc. (the “Company”) on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 30, 2026, the Company announced that John O’Connor, the Company’s General Counsel, was leaving the Company effective immediately. Subsequent to that announcement, Mr. O’Connor entered into a Separation Agreement with the Company, date…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On March 30, 2026 , Goosehead Insurance, Inc. (the “Company”) announced that John O’Connor will be leaving the Company effective immediately. The terms relating to Mr. O’Connor’s separation from the Company will be disclosed when finalized.
Other Events. On March 30, 2026 , the Company announced that it has approved the appointment of Martin Ellis Thornthwaite to serve as General Counsel of the Company, effective immediately. Mr. Thornthwaite most recently served as Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel at RealPage, Inc., where he was responsible for overseeing complex commercial and consumer litigation, regulatory and governmental investigations, and employment-related legal matters and supported corporate governa…