Reading RWT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track RWT free→Reading RWT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track RWT free→
NYSEReal EstateReit - MortgageSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. The company was unprofitable over the past year, so its earnings quality can't be assessed. Peer multiples imply a price roughly in line with where it trades (about fair); the read is fair, but weakening. If the Fed starts cutting rates, that would be a tailwind for RWT and other Real Estate names. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $5.24. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $5.24 RWT trades at 12× p/e, in line with its 10× p/e peer median. Our $5.36 fair value reflects that, high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 2% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 17%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Real Estate names rated weak grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=1506).
Over the trailing year it converted 137.98x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market and real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.24 → $0.24 (+2.6% / 30d). 3 raised, 2 cut, 6 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 63% of analysts rate Buy.
1 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$111.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$283.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,121.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Changes in book value reflect the company's financial health and market conditions.
Confirms:GAAP book value per share decreases below $7.12.
Disproves:GAAP book value per share increases above $7.36.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for RWT yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Regulation FD Disclosure. On June 11, 2026, Redwood Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing that the Board of Directors (the "Board") declared second quarter 2026 common and preferred stock dividends. The Board declared a second quarter 2026 regular common stock dividend of $0.18 per share, payable on June 30, 2026 to stockholders of record on June 23, 2026. In accordance with the terms of the Company's 10.00% Series A Fixed-Rate Reset Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Sto…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Mortgage REITs.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
RWT Redwood Trust, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | fair | moderate |
NLY Annaly Capital Management | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 32 of 100 | full | moderate |
AGNC AGNC Investment Corp | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 38 of 100 | full | moderate |
STWD Starwood Property Trust | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 28 of 100 | full | moderate |
RITM Rithm Capital | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 58 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
8 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Real Estate names rated volatile grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3774).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLRE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Continue the regular quarterly dividend of $0.18 per common share.
Achieve record mortgage banking production and expand distribution capabilities.
Establish strategic partnerships to enhance market presence and capabilities.
Redwood Trust has announced a share buyback program as part of its capital allocation strategy.
Why it matters: Keeping the dividend shows stability. This can attract investors looking for income.
Confirms:Redwood Trust maintains its dividend at $0.18 per share for the next quarter.
Disproves:Redwood Trust reduces its dividend per share below $0.18.
Why it matters: Better net income would show improved operations. This could help investors feel more confident and support the stock.
Confirms:Net income turns positive in Q2 2026.
Disproves:Net income remains negative in Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Details about the joint venture may show growth chances and market position.
Confirms one read:Announcement of partners or terms for the strategic joint venture.
Confirms the other:No further details or a cancellation of the joint venture plans.
Why it matters: The buyback shows trust in the company's value and how it uses its money.
Confirms:A public announcement confirming the start of the share buyback program.
Disproves:No news or delays in the share buyback program.
Why it matters: The joint venture could enhance market position and drive future growth.
Confirms:Redwood Trust announces a big partnership or investment for the joint venture.
Disproves:No updates or progress reported on the joint venture in the next quarter.
Why it matters: Going above this production level would show growth in mortgage banking. It shows strong demand and good operations.
Confirms:Mortgage banking production exceeds $8.5 billion in Q2 2026.
Disproves:Mortgage banking production falls below $8.5 billion in Q2 2026.
Why it matters: The buyback could help shareholders. It shows confidence in the company's finances.
Confirms:Redwood Trust completes the buyback of at least $50 million worth of shares.
Disproves:Redwood Trust delays or cancels the buyback program.
Entry Into a Material Definitive Agreement. Completion of Public Offering of Senior Notes On May 27, 2026, Redwood Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) completed its registered underwritten public offering of $125,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 9.75% Senior Notes due 2031 (the “Notes”) pursuant to an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, UBS Securities LLC, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation Under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information required by this
(e) Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Employees Redwood Trust, Inc. (“the Company”) held its 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 19, 2026 (the “Annual Meeting”). During the Annual Meeting, stockholders voted to approve an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Company’s Second Amended and Restated 2014 Incentive Award Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) to increase the number of shares available for issuance under the Incentive Plan by 8,500,000 shares of common stock. With both stockholder app…
Other Events. On May 19, 2026, Redwood Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, UBS Securities LLC, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and Piper Sandler & Co., as representatives of the several underwriters named therein (collectively, the “Underwriters”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Underwriters, and the Underwriters agreed to purchase fr…