Reading RPD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track RPD free→Reading RPD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track RPD free→
NASDAQInformation TechnologySoftware - InfrastructureSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits, and the sector backdrop is a tailwind, benefiting RPD. Peer multiples imply a price about 84% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and the performance of sector bellwethers like MSFT and ORCL. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $6.93. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $7.17 RPD trades at 5× p/e, below its 28× p/e peer median. Our $43 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $6.00–$9.00. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 83% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 4%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 68% for the rest of the cohort, n=3704).
Over the trailing year it converted 7.31x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated robust grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.37 → $0.35 (-5.8% / 30d). 2 raised, 18 cut, 24 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 11% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 18.0% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$242.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$685.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $8,027.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The earnings report will provide insights into revenue and profit trends. This is key for assessing performance.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows revenue growth and profit margins improving.
Confirms the other:The earnings report shows lower revenue and profit margins.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for RPD yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Chief Executive Officer Transition On May 26, 2026, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Rapid7, Inc. (the “Company”) appointed Wael Mohamed as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective as of June 1, 2026. Mr. Mohamed succeeds Corey Thomas, who has been appointed Executive Chairman, effective as of June 1, 2026. Messrs. Mohamed and Thoma…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$6.00 – $9.00 (median $8.00) · 9 analysts · as of 2026-05-07
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Systems Software.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
RPD Rapid7, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
MSFT Microsoft | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 84 of 100 | full | moderate |
PANW Palo Alto Networks | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 42 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
CRWD CrowdStrike | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 31 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
FTNT Fortinet | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
10 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=793).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Rapid7 aims to achieve its full-year 2026 revenue guidance of $836 million to $842 million.
Rapid7 is focused on maintaining its non-GAAP EPS guidance of $1.52 to $1.60 for the full year 2026.
Rapid7 aims to achieve its free cash flow guidance of $125 million to $135 million for the full year 2026.
Why it matters: If revenue growth falls below median, it signals a slowdown in the sector. This could hurt investor confidence.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below the median growth rate for the sector.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth remains above the median growth rate for the sector.
and in the accompanying Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ Exchange Act ”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On March 26, 2026, Rapid7, Inc. (“ Company ”) entered into a Nomination and Support Agreement (the “ Nomination and Support Agreement ”) with JANA Partners Management, LP (together with its controlled affiliates and controlled associates, “ JANA ”). In accordance with the Nomination and Support Agreement, the Company has agreed to include Kevin Galligan (the “ JANA Nominee ”) in the Company’s slate of recommended nominees for election as directors a…
and in the accompanying Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ Exchange Act ”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On February 5, 2026, Mr. Michael Berry notified the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company that he has decided not to stand for re-election to the Board at the Company’s 2026 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the “ Annual Meeting ”). Mr. Berry will continue to serve as a director until the conclusion of the Annual Meeting. Mr. Berry'…