Reading PLTR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PLTR free→Reading PLTR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PLTR free→NASDAQInformation TechnologySoftware - InfrastructureSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and management's recent track record has been steady. However, earnings quality is fragile, indicating that reported profits may not be well-supported by cash. Peer multiples imply a price about 535% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified, as it is rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. Key factors to watch include any potential guidance cuts from PLTR and the performance of sector bellwethers like MSFT and ORCL. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $133.25. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $135, PLTR's earnings are too small for P/E to mean much; on sales it trades at 73× p/s (24.6× the 3× p/s peer median, and 1.4× even its own history). At a normal multiple the price implies ~537% near-term growth vs our ~55% forecast. That gap is an optionality premium a financial-multiple model can't price — our $21 fair value covers only the as-is business, low confidence. Analysts: $138–$200. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 537% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 55%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=889): about 49% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 85% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 3 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.19x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated fragile grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 65% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.00 → $0.35. 21 raised, 0 cut, 22 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 3 maintained. 61% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 27.1% above current price.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$175.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$622.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,822.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Meeting or exceeding this guidance would confirm strong demand and growth momentum.
Confirms:Q2 2026 revenue reported at $1.801 billion or higher.
Disproves:Q2 2026 revenue reported below $1.797 billion.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
AI risk could hinder competitive positioning.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
and in the accompanying Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing, unless expressly incorporated by specific reference in such filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$138.00 – $200.00 (median $175.00) · 6 analysts · as of 2026-05-22
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Application Software.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
PLTR Palantir Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 83 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
ORCL Oracle Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 66 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
SAP SAP SE | — | — | elevated |
APP AppLovin | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 60 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
CRM Salesforce | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 100 of 100 | fair | elevated |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=797).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on expanding U.S. commercial revenue, aiming for significant year-over-year growth.
Increase adjusted free cash flow guidance to reflect improved operational efficiency.
Focus on achieving significant revenue growth across all segments.
Why it matters: This report will provide insights into revenue growth and operational performance. It is a key event for assessing company health.
Confirms one read:The earnings report shows that revenue is growing. It also shows positive income from operations.
Confirms the other:The earnings report shows a drop in revenue. It also shows negative income from operations.
Why it matters: Exceeding this growth rate signals strong demand and effective sales strategies. It shows Palantir is gaining traction in the market.
Confirms:Q2 2022 revenue grew more than 26% compared to last year.
Disproves:Q2 2022 revenue grew less than 26% compared to last year.
Why it matters: Raising this guidance shows better cash management. It may boost investor confidence.
Confirms:Management raises guidance for adjusted free cash flow in the next quarters.
Disproves:Management keeps or lowers guidance for adjusted free cash flow.
Why it matters: Sustaining this growth rate would confirm strong demand for Palantir's services.
Confirms:TCV reported above $2.41 billion, showing over 60% YoY growth.
Disproves:TCV reported below $2.41 billion, showing less than 60% YoY growth.
Why it matters: Keeping this growth rate shows Palantir's strong position in the market. It shows good customer growth.
Confirms:US commercial revenue grew more than 100% compared to last year.
Disproves:US commercial revenue grew less than 100% compared to last year.
Advances: Increase U.S. commercial revenue
Upgrade reflects confidence in AI-driven commercial growth.
Investor scrutiny may impact public perception and contracts.
Investor scrutiny may impact public perception and contracts.
Advances: Increase U.S. commercial revenue
New enterprise deals enhance U.S. commercial revenue growth.
Advances: Increase U.S. commercial revenue
Partnership enhances U.S. commercial revenue growth potential.
Legal action may delay revenue from the Met deal.
Legal action may delay revenue from the Met deal.
and in the accompanying Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing, unless expressly incorporated by specific reference in such filing.
and in the accompanying Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing, unless expressly incorporated by specific reference in such filing.
and in the accompanying Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing, unless expressly incorporated by specific reference in such filing.