Reading ADSK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ADSK free→Reading ADSK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ADSK free→NASDAQInformation TechnologySoftware - ApplicationSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is mixed, and risk is elevated, while the sector backdrop is a tailwind, helping ADSK compared with sector peers, which trade above typical levels. Peer multiples imply a price about 6% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. The valuation is based on being priced roughly in line with peer multiples. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $201.38. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $199 ADSK trades at 18× p/e, below its 21× p/e peer median. Our $191 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $262–$369. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 4% near-term growth, below our forecast of about 17%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.90x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2831).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $3.04 → $3.12 (+2.5% / 30d). 21 raised, 2 cut, 25 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 10 maintained. 91% of analysts rate Buy.
5 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 33.4% above current price.
0 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
Transition story with positive analyst positioning (often a turnaround setup).
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$157.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$408.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,928.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Earnings results show financial health and how well the company runs. Strong results can help investors feel confident.
Confirms one read:Earnings per share (EPS) exceeds guidance of $0.06 - $0.10.
Confirms the other:EPS falls below guidance of $0.06 - $0.10.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advances: Optimize sales and marketing
Enhances sales and marketing through targeted digital platform.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement On June 15, 2026 (the “Effective Date”), Autodesk, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into an Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement (the “Revolver Amendment”), which amends the Company’s existing Credit Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2025, among the Company, Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”), as administrative agent, and the lenders from time to time party thereto (as amended, the “Revolving Credit Agreement”). Among other t…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$262.00 – $369.00 (median $305.00) · 11 analysts · as of 2026-05-29
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3, 2027-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Application Software.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ADSK Autodesk | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 87 of 100 | full | elevated |
ORCL Oracle Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 66 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
PLTR Palantir Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
SAP SAP SE | — | — | elevated |
APP AppLovin | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 60 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
20 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=793).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Autodesk plans to acquire MaintainX to advance its unified platform in operations.
Autodesk continues to optimize its sales and marketing to drive higher margins.
Autodesk aims to enhance its operating margin through strategic initiatives.
Autodesk aims to exceed its financial guidance through strong business performance.
Why it matters: This growth rate will show how well Autodesk is doing in its subscription transition. Strong growth supports confidence in future earnings.
Confirms:Total ARR growth exceeds 30% year over year in Q2 FY2026.
Disproves:Total ARR growth falls below 25% year over year in Q2 FY2026.
Why it matters: Deferred revenue growth shows future revenue potential. Strong growth means a healthy pipeline.
Confirms:Deferred revenue increases by more than 15% year over year in Q2 FY2026.
Disproves:Deferred revenue growth is less than 10% year over year in Q2 FY2026.
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information set forth under Items 1.01, “Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement,” is incorporated herein by reference.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 28, 2026, Autodesk, Inc. (“Autodesk” or the “Company”) issued a press release reporting financial results for the first fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2026. The press release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by reference in any filing under…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On May 28, 2026, Autodesk, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Autodesk” or the “Company”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Matterhorn Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Autodesk (“Merger Sub”), MaintainX Inc., a Delaware corporation (“MaintainX”), and Shareholder Representative Services LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, solely in its capacity as the securityholde…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Retirement of Director On April 20, 2026, Stephen Milligan informed the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Autodesk, Inc. (the “Company”) of his intention not to stand for re-election at the Company’s 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). On April 24, 2026, the Company issued a press release regarding Mr. Milligan’s retiremen…