Reading NVDA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track NVDA free→Reading NVDA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track NVDA free→NASDAQInformation TechnologySemiconductorsSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality is fragile, reported profits aren't backed by cash. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, and risk is moderate. The sector backdrop is a tailwind, and compared with sector peers, NVDA is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 38% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk, as it trades below peer multiples while earnings quality is fragile. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $207.41. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $212 NVDA trades at 36× p/e, below its 70× p/e peer median. Our $341 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Analysts: $139–$500. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 38% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 100%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 3 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.79x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated fragile grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 65% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.95 → $2.08 (+6.5% / 30d). 34 raised, 3 cut, 40 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 25 maintained. 95% of analysts rate Buy.
23 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 40.2% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$159.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$371.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,021.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A strong revenue forecast shows that people want NVIDIA's AI and data center products.
Confirms:NVIDIA guides Q2 revenue to $91 billion or more, plus or minus 2%.
Disproves:NVIDIA guides Q2 revenue below $89 billion.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advances: Expand AI and Data Center capabilities
Highlights NVIDIA's leadership in AI discussions.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 20, 2026, NVIDIA Corporation, or the Company, issued a press release announcing its results for the quarter ended April 26, 2026. The press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. Attached hereto as Exhibit 99.2 and incorporated by reference herein is financial information and commentary by Colette M. Kress, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, regarding results for the q…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$139.00 – $500.00 (median $300.00) · 37 analysts · as of 2026-06-02
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3, 2027-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Semiconductors.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 88 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. | — | — | moderate |
AVGO Broadcom | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
MU Micron Technology | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
AMD Advanced Micro Devices | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 47 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
8 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1040).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
NVIDIA aims to expand its AI and Data Center capabilities, focusing on AI factories and infrastructure.
NVIDIA is focused on enhancing AI-driven gaming and visualization technologies.
NVIDIA is actively pursuing strategic partnerships and collaborations to enhance its market position.
NVIDIA is committed to increasing shareholder returns through share repurchases and dividends.
Why it matters: This guidance reflects NVIDIA's growth expectations in AI and Data Center markets. A strong outlook could boost investor confidence.
Confirms:Revenue guidance for Q1 fiscal 2027 is $78 billion or higher.
Disproves:Revenue guidance falls below $76 billion.
Why it matters: New AI factory announcements would show NVIDIA's lead in AI infrastructure growth.
Confirms:NVIDIA has new partnerships or expansions for AI factories.
Disproves:No new news about AI factory expansions.
Why it matters: New share repurchase plans show management's confidence. This can help the stock price.
Confirms:NVIDIA has a new share buyback plan worth over $80 billion.
Disproves:No new share repurchase announcements after Q2 earnings.
Why it matters: High growth in Data Center revenue is important for NVIDIA's performance.
Confirms:Data Center revenue growth exceeds 20% YoY in Q2.
Disproves:Data Center revenue growth falls below 20% YoY.
Why it matters: New partnerships can enhance NVIDIA's market position and expand its AI capabilities. This is key for future growth.
Confirms one read:NVIDIA announces a big new partnership in AI or Data Center tech.
Confirms the other:No new big partnerships are announced in the next quarter.
Advances: Expand AI and Data Center capabilities
Reinforces NVIDIA's role in shaping AI norms.
AMD's deal could intensify competition in AI and data centers.
Competitor's performance could impact NVDA's market position.
Nio's chip production may intensify competition.
Competitor's performance could impact NVDA's market position.
Export controls could hinder NVIDIA's market access and growth.
Advances: Expand AI and Data Center capabilities
CoreWeave's achievement enhances NVIDIA's AI capabilities.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. (d) On May 7, 2026, the Board of Directors, or the Board, of NVIDIA Corporation appointed Suzanne Nora Johnson as a member of the Board and as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board and the number of directors constituting the full Board was increased from ten to eleven, in each case effective July 13, 2026. Ms. Nora Johnson will join the Boa…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. (b) On April 24, 2026, Donald Robertson, Vice President, or VP, and Chief Accounting Officer, or CAO, of NVIDIA Corporation, or the Company, notified the Company of his intention to retire from his role as VP and CAO, effective May 4, 2026. Following such date, he will remain with the Company as VP, Finance to support various projects until July 1,…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Adoption of Fiscal Year 2027 Variable Compensation Plan On March 2, 2026, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, or the Board, of NVIDIA Corporation, or the Company, adopted the Variable Compensation Plan for Fiscal Year 2027, or the 2027 Plan, which provides eligible executive officers the opportunity to earn a variable cash payment…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 25, 2026, NVIDIA Corporation, or the Company, issued a press release announcing its results for the quarter ended January 25, 2026. The press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. Attached hereto as Exhibit 99.2 and incorporated by reference herein is financial information and commentary by Colette M. Kress, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, regarding results fo…