Reading ON? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ON free→Reading ON? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ON free→NASDAQInformation TechnologySemiconductorsSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes, while the sector backdrop is a tailwind. Risk is elevated, and the company is priced roughly in line with peers, but recent financials or earnings quality are weakening. Peer multiples imply a price about 20% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $125.90. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $126 ON trades at 56× p/e, below its 70× p/e peer median. Our $158 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 20% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -5%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 68% for the rest of the cohort, n=3704).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.43x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated robust grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.66 → $0.71 (+7.5% / 30d). 28 raised, 0 cut, 29 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 4 maintained. 42% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 3 guided quarters · 37.3% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$237.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$460.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,810.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A drop in gross margin may mean higher costs. This could hurt profits.
Confirms:Gross margin falls below 37.9%.
Disproves:Gross margin remains above 39.9%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for ON yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On May 11, 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation (the “ Company ”) completed its previously announced private unregistered offering of $1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of its 0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 (the “ Notes ”), which amount includes the full exercise of the initial purchasers’ option to purchase $200 million aggregate principal amount of additional Notes. Indenture The Notes were issued under an Indenture, dated as of May 11, 2…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Semiconductors.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ON ON Semiconductor | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 47 of 100 | fair | elevated |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 86 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. | — | — | moderate |
AVGO Broadcom | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
MU Micron Technology | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 80 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
15 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Information Technology names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=793).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on improving gross margin through cost management and operational efficiency.
Continue to grow presence in automotive and industrial sectors through strategic investments.
Drive growth in AI data center segment through strategic partnerships and technology advancements.
Focus on sustaining revenue growth despite recent challenges.
Aim to enhance gross margin through operational efficiencies.
Why it matters: Maintaining revenue growth is a top priority. A drop below 5% signals trouble.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported at 5% or higher year over year.
Why it matters: Guidance below this level shows ongoing revenue problems. It may also show wider market issues.
Confirms:Q1 2025 revenue guidance is set below $1,350 million.
Disproves:Q1 2025 revenue guidance meets or exceeds $1,350 million.
Why it matters: Slower growth in this segment could indicate a loss of momentum in a key area.
Confirms:AI data center revenue growth falls below 30% sequentially.
Disproves:AI data center revenue growth is over 30% from last quarter.
Why it matters: Improving gross margin is crucial for profitability. A rise above 10% would be positive.
Confirms:Gross margin improvement reported above 10% in the next earnings call.
Disproves:Gross margin improvement reported below 5% in the next earnings call.
Why it matters: Better gross margins may show improved cost control and efficiency. These are key goals for management.
Confirms:Gross margin for Q1 2025 exceeds 40.9%.
Disproves:Gross margin for Q1 2025 falls below 38.9%.
Why it matters: News about share buybacks may show that management trusts the company's finances.
Confirms:News of completed share buybacks or major steps in the buyback plan.
Disproves:No updates or indications that the buyback program is being delayed or scaled back.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. (b) As previously disclosed by ON Semiconductor Corporation ( the “ Company ” and, together with its affiliates, “ onsemi ”), Simon Keeton, the former Group President, Power Solutions Group, of onsemi, stepped down from all officer positions with onsemi effective March 9, 2026, as mutually agreed between the parties. Mr. Keeton’s final day of full…
and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ Exchange Act ”), or otherwise subject to liability under that section, nor shall such information be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities. The disclosures set forth in Items 1.01 and 8.01 of this Current Report are incorporated herein by reference. The offer and sale of the Notes and the guarantees to the initial purchasers were made in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “ Securities Act ”), and for resale by the initial purchasers to persons reasonably believed to be qualified institutional buyers in acco…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The disclosures set forth in