Reading LNZA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LNZA free→Reading LNZA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LNZA free→
NASDAQIndustrialsWaste ManagementSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak. Earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent changes. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, it is below typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 59% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk. This pattern occurs because it trades below peer multiples, but recent financials are weak. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 1 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $5.88. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $5.20 LNZA trades at 1× p/s, below its 2× p/s peer median. Our $15 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price sits about 64% below a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated weak grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=3678).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.19x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $-2.00 → $-0.76 (+62.0% / 30d). 1 raised, 0 cut, 1 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 0% of analysts rate Buy.
1 positive, 0 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$561.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$1,627.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $9,107.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Revenue growth is a key focus area. Strong growth signals positive momentum.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported above 10% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported below 0% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for LNZA yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Other Events. On June 3, 2026, Beijing Shougang LanzaTech Technology Co., Ltd. (“Shougang LanzaTech”), a joint venture in which LanzaTech Global, Inc. (the “Company”) held an approximately 9.31% equity interest, prior to the offering described below, completed its initial public offering of 40 million H Shares on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “Hong Kong Stock Exchange”). The final offer price was priced at a U.S. dollar equivalent of approximately US$1.86 per H Share, based on…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Environmental & Facilities Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
LNZA LanzaTech Global Inc | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 16 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
WM Waste Management | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | fair | moderate |
RSG Republic Services | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 81 of 100 | fair | moderate |
ROL Rollins, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
VLTO Veralto | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 100 of 100 | fair | moderate |
23 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Industrials names rated volatile grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=840).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
LanzaTech's joint venture, Shougang LanzaTech, completed its IPO on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
Management is focused on increasing revenue despite recent fluctuations.
Management aims to improve operating income, which has been negative.
Why it matters: Sector performance can affect LanzaTech's growth and how investors feel.
Confirms one read:After the FOMC meeting, the industrial sector shows good performance trends.
Confirms the other:After the FOMC meeting, the industrial sector shows poor performance trends.
Why it matters: Progress in this partnership could help growth. It may also support LanzaTech's strategy.
Confirms:Look for a press release about new projects or milestones from the Shougang partnership.
Disproves:No updates or signs of progress in the partnership for the next quarter.
of this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1 furnished herewith, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of such Section. The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be ex…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. Securities Purchase Agreement On May 15, 2026, LanzaTech Global, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutional investors (together, the “Investors”), providing for the issuance and sale by the Company of an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, $0.0000001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”). The Sha…
Regulation FD Disclosure. On May 4, 2026, LanzaTech Global, Inc. (the “Company”) made available an investor presentation (the “Presentation”) that the Company intends to use in communications with investors and other stakeholders. A copy of the Presentation is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The Presentation provides an update on the Company’s business, liquidity-related actions and strategic initiatives. The information contained in the Presentation is summary i…
Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant. (a) Dismissal of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm On April 10, 2026, upon the recommendation and approval of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”), the Board of Directors of LanzaTech Global, Inc. ratified and approved the dismissal of Deloitte as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, effective April 10, 2026. Deloitte’s reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements…