HEALTHY CHOICE WELLNESS CORP (HCWC)
AMEXConsumer StaplesGrocery StoresSnapshot 2026-10-29
$2.50-13.49%
Close 2026-10-15 · 1-day change
AMEXConsumer StaplesGrocery StoresSnapshot 2026-10-29
Research Workspace
Put HCWC beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Primary pillar under pressure — Improve EPS toward break-even: Comparison needs review.
View ThesisManagement screens weak on capital allocation.
View ManagementThis stock is highly volatile — it swings about 4% on a typical day and fell roughly 90% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskHCWC’s case rests on improving earnings, but its recent performance remains weak. The desk provides no revenue history, and HCWC was unprofitable over the past year. Its last recorded earnings surprise was 28%, with no release details available. HCWC trades at 0.9× sales versus 0.7× for peers. The price is roughly in line with the growth we forecast. The multiple premium could compress, and our model puts next-quarter misses near 22%. The EPS comparison needs review, so a confirmed break is unverified. Peer multiples imply a price about 12% below where it trades. The thesis is on watch, and this read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-10-15. HCWC is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Continue this research
Compare HCWC with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCWC Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 0 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-29. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Packaged Foods & Meats — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put HCWC next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-10-15. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Bottom 25% on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.