Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM)
NYSEInformation TechnologySoftware - ApplicationSnapshot 2026-10-30
$6.810.00%
Close 2026-10-30 · 1-day change
NYSEInformation TechnologySoftware - ApplicationSnapshot 2026-10-30
Research Workspace
Put CXM beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Application Software is in steady. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
Management is running behind on a stated commitment.
View ThesisRevenue is growing steadily — about 6% over the past year.
View GrowthManagement screens strong on earnings delivery, margins.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is volatile — it swings about 2% on a typical day and fell roughly 41% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskCXM’s earnings carry cash-backed profits, but revenue growth has slowed sharply. Revenue grew 1% year over year in Q2 FY2027, after 7% previously. The latest quarter beat on non-GAAP earnings, supporting the case for steady execution. CXM trades at 18× P/E versus a 30× peer median. Expectations look modest versus our view, though the Mania market cycle raises risk. Management is running behind on a stated commitment. Our model puts the next-quarter miss probability near 21%. Peer multiples imply a price about 31% above where it trades; this read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-10-30. CXM is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 9 analysts currently covering CXM (as of Oct 2026).
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
Continue this research
Compare CXM with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXM Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 10 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-30. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Application Software — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Our valuation methods disagree too much on this name right now. Rather than print a number we don't believe, we're holding it back until they converge.
Compare the value case
Put CXM next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Threatens: Achieve revenue growth
Revenue growth stagnation raises concerns about future performance.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-10-30. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Above average on quality vs scored peers
A second lens on the 12-month fair value: for companies that score high on measured quality (profitability, balance-sheet safety, earnings stability), this read trusts more of today's profit margins instead of averaging them toward their multi-year history the way the headline number does. Shown alongside the fair value above, not in place of it. A diagnostic, not a price target or a buy/sell signal.
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
Threatens: Improve operating income and margins
Margin pressures indicate potential difficulties in improving profitability.
Advances: Achieve revenue growth
AI momentum and strategic shifts could enhance revenue growth.
Advances: Achieve revenue growth
Revenue forecast aligns with growth objectives.
Threatens: Achieve revenue growth
Revenue miss could hinder growth objectives.
Advances: Achieve revenue growth
Earnings beat supports revenue growth narrative.
Achieve revenue growth
Revenue in line with expectations supports growth objective.
Threatens: Achieve revenue growth
Slashed growth outlook raises doubts about future revenue potential.
