Reading CLSK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CLSK free→Reading CLSK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CLSK free→
NASDAQInformation TechnologyCapital MarketsSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is fragile, reported profits aren't backed by cash. Management's recent track record has been steady, but risk is high, and the company is priced below typical for the sector. Peer multiples imply a price about 19% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. The outlook hinges on sector trends, particularly the performance of the bellwether MARA, which could influence CLSK's momentum. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $17.14. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $17, CLSK's earnings are too small for P/E to mean much; on sales it trades at 14× p/s (3.9× the 4× p/s peer median, and 1.7× even its own history). At a normal multiple the price implies ~22% near-term growth vs our ~100% forecast. That gap is an optionality premium a financial-multiple model can't price — our $14 fair value covers only the as-is business, low confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 22% near-term growth, below our forecast of about 100%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 68% for the rest of the cohort, n=3704).
Over the trailing year it converted -1.26x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated fragile grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 65% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $-0.18 → $-0.26 (-41.7% / 30d). 0 raised, 0 cut, 2 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 100% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$396.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$775.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $6,474.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A decrease in Bitcoin holdings could signal liquidity issues or poor market conditions. It affects the company's financial health.
Confirms:Bitcoin holdings are below $900 million.
Disproves:Bitcoin holdings remain above $900 million.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for CLSK yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this Current Report on Form 8-K (including Exhibit 99.1) should not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2021-Q2, 2021-Q3, 2022-Q1, 2022-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Information Technology (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 4 of 100 | full | high |
FLEX Flex Ltd. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 80 of 100 | full | elevated |
TWLO Twilio | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 85 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 32 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
P Everpure | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 83 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Information Technology names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=797).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
CleanSpark aims to expand its AI and HPC infrastructure, focusing on new utility-grade power capacity and site portfolio expansion.
CleanSpark focuses on enhancing its digital infrastructure, including land and power development and construction projects.
CleanSpark aims to commercialize its AI and HPC-applicable assets to drive transformation and growth.
Why it matters: If it drops below this level, it shows ongoing problems with making money. This could mean bigger issues with the business model.
Confirms:Q2 2026 revenue reported below $130 million.
Disproves:Q2 2026 revenue reported above $130 million.
Why it matters: Advancing in AI and HPC will show CleanSpark's ability to diversify and grow. This is key to long-term success.
Confirms:Look for news about new AI or HPC contracts or partnerships.
Disproves:No new contracts or partnerships announced in the next quarter.
Other Events In connection with the approval of the Amended and Restated CoD, the Board, excluding Messrs. Schultz and McNeill, approved the payment of the Special Final Preferred Dividend to the Series A Holders of record as of March 19, 2026, which the Company expects to pay on or about March 24, 2026.
Material Modification to Rights of Security Holders On March 20, 2026, CleanSpark, Inc. (the “Company”) filed a First Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Amended and Restated CoD”) with the office of the Nevada Secretary of State, which became effective on such date. The Amended and Restated CoD amends the terms of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred”) to provide that: (i) the quarterly dividend payable to holders of th…
of this Current Report on Form 8-K (including Exhibit 99.1) should not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.