Reading AAPL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AAPL free→Reading AAPL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AAPL free→
NASDAQInformation TechnologyConsumer ElectronicsSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality is fragile, indicating that reported profits are not well backed by cash. Management's recent track record has been neutral, and risk is moderate. The sector backdrop is a tailwind, and compared with sector peers, AAPL is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 50% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich, as it trades above peer multiples, and the longer horizon does not make that back through growth. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $299.24. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $299 the market pays 36× p/e — above the 26× p/e peer median but in line with its own 33× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $195 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $253–$400. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 50% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, weak execution quality. Capped at elevated by the Mania regime.
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.14x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated fragile grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 65% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.00 → $1.90. 24 raised, 0 cut, 32 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 7 maintained. 63% of analysts rate Buy.
3 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 15.1% above current price.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$95.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$193.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,380.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Earnings above this level would show strong demand and good operations. This would boost investor confidence.
Confirms:Q2 2026 earnings results exceed $115 billion in revenue.
Disproves:Q2 2026 earnings results fall below $110 billion in revenue.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advances: Expand Installed Base of Active Devices
Regulatory clearance supports expansion of active devices.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 30, 2026, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) issued a press release regarding Apple’s financial results for its second fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2026. A copy of Apple’s press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. The information contained in this Current Report shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the S…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$253.00 – $400.00 (median $330.00) · 16 analysts · as of 2026-06-09
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
SNDK Sandisk | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 78 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
DELL Dell Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | full | elevated |
STX Seagate Technology | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
WDC Western Digital | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
8 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1040).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 0.0% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on growing the Services segment to achieve new revenue records.
Continue to grow the installed base of active devices across all product categories.
Continue returning capital to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.
Transition of CEO role from Tim Cook to John Ternus, effective September 1, 2026.
Transition of General Counsel role to Jennifer Newstead, effective March 1, 2026.
Why it matters: Slower growth in Services revenue may show less demand for Apple's services. This could hurt overall growth.
Confirms:Services revenue growth below 10% year over year in Q2 2026.
Disproves:Services revenue growth remains above 10% year over year in Q2 2026.
Why it matters: A drop in the growth of the installed base may show problems in keeping customers. It may also show issues with product appeal.
Confirms:Installed base growth below 5% year over year in Q2 2026.
Disproves:Installed base growth remains above 5% year over year in Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Ternus' vision will guide Apple's future. This could affect investor confidence and stock performance.
Confirms one read:John Ternus outlines a clear strategic vision for Apple within the next quarter.
Confirms the other:John Ternus has not shared a clear strategic vision during this time.
Threatens: CEO transition to John Ternus
Probe could impact leadership's strategic direction.
Intel deal could enhance product capabilities.
Advances: Expand Installed Base of Active Devices
Regulatory clearance supports expansion in India.
Contamination allegations could impact reputation.
Environmental issues could lead to legal challenges for Apple.
Environmental issues could lead to legal challenges for Apple.
Environmental issues could lead to legal challenges for Apple.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers . On April 20, 2026, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) announced that Tim Cook will transition from his role as Chief Executive Officer to Executive Chair of Apple’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), effective September 1, 2026 (the “Transition Date”). On April 17, 2026, the Board appointed John Ternus, Apple’s Senior Vice President of Hardware Engineering, as C…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On January 29, 2026, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) issued a press release regarding Apple’s financial results for its first fiscal quarter ended December 27, 2025. A copy of Apple’s press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. The information contained in this Current Report shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by reference in any filing under t…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. As part of Apple Inc.’s (“Apple’s”) previously announced Principal Accounting Officer transition plan, Apple’s Board of Directors appointed Ben Borders, 45, as Apple’s Principal Accounting Officer, effective January 1, 2026. Mr. Borders succeeds Chris Kondo in the role of Principal Accounting Officer. Mr. Borders joined Apple in November 2010 and a…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On December 4, 2025, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) announced that Jennifer Newstead will become Apple’s general counsel on March 1, 2026, following a transition of duties from Kate Adams, who has served as Apple’s general counsel since 2017. Ms. Newstead will join Apple as senior vice president in January, reporting to CEO Tim Cook and serving on Apple’s ex…