Reading IONQ? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track IONQ free→Reading IONQ? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track IONQ free→
NYSEInformation TechnologyComputer HardwareSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak. Earnings quality is fragile, and management is volatile. Risk is high, but the sector backdrop is a tailwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 28% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk. This pattern occurs because it trades below peer multiples, but recent financials are weak. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $61.23. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $61 IONQ trades at 20× p/e, below its 26× p/e peer median. Our $86 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $35–$85. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 28% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 100%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 0 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated weak grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted -1.22x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated fragile grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 65% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $-0.51 → $-0.60 (-16.6% / 30d). 1 raised, 4 cut, 6 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 85% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$322.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$890.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $6,761.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If revenue growth drops, it could signal a slowdown in the growth phase of the sector.
Confirms:Revenue growth falls below the median for the sector.
Disproves:Revenue growth stays above the median.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for IONQ yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 6, 2026, IonQ, Inc. (the “ Company ”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference. The information provided in this Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$35.00 – $85.00 (median $51.75) · 6 analysts · as of 2026-05-07
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
IONQ IonQ, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 53 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
AAPL Apple Inc | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
SNDK Sandisk | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 78 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
DELL Dell Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | full | elevated |
STX Seagate Technology | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 64 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
24 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Information Technology names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=793).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
IonQ has raised its full-year revenue guidance to $270 million at the high end.
Stated in 2 of last 2 quarters. Revenue grew from $61.89M in 2025-Q4 to $64.67M in 2026-Q1. The increase in revenue guidance to $270M reflects a positive trajectory, aligning with recent revenue growth.
“IonQ raised its revenue expectations for the full year to $270 million at the high end.”
“IonQ expects revenue to be between $225 million and $245 million.”
IonQ has engaged in M&A activity, including a merger agreement with SkyWater Technology.
Newly stated in 2026-Q1. The merger agreement with SkyWater Technology marks a strategic move in M&A activity. While financial impacts are not yet visible, this indicates a focus on growth through acquisitions.
“IonQ entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with SkyWater Technology.”
IonQ aims to improve its operating income, which has been negative in recent quarters.
Stated in 4 of last 4 quarters. Operating income declined from -$160.59M in 2025-Q2 to -$271.51M in 2026-Q1, indicating limited progress in improving operating income. The trajectory shows a need for further cost management.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On March 19, 2026, the Board of Directors (the “ Board ”) of IonQ, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “ Company ”), on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, added a seat to the Board and elected William F. Scannell, age 63, to the resulting vacancy, effective March 20, 2026. The vacancy to which Mr. Sc…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 25, 2026, IonQ, Inc. (the “ Company ”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2025. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference. The information provided in this Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of…
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities. On March 11, 2026, IonQ, Inc. (the “Company”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a prospectus supplement to the prospectus included in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3ASR filed with the SEC on February 26, 2025 (File No. 333-285279) (the “Registration Statement”), covering the resale by the selling stockholder of an aggregate of 2,562,642 shares of Company common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. The prospec…
Other Events. On February 27, 2026, IonQ, Inc. (the “Company”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a prospectus supplement to the prospectus included in the Company’s registration statement on Form S-3ASR filed with the SEC on February 26, 2025 (File No. 333-285279) (the “Registration Statement”), covering the resale by certain selling stockholders of an aggregate of 5,127,459 shares of Company common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. A copy of the legal opinion of…
“Operating income was reported as -$271.51M.”
“Operating income was -$228.63M.”
“Operating income was -$168.81M.”
“Operating income was -$160.59M.”