Reading CSCO? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CSCO free→Reading CSCO? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CSCO free→NASDAQInformation TechnologyCommunication EquipmentSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality is fragile, reported profits aren't backed by cash, and management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. The sector backdrop is a tailwind, and compared with sector peers, CSCO is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 8% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. If CSCO cuts guidance on the next call, that could have a meaningful negative impact.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $119.57. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $120 CSCO trades at 29× p/e, below its 39× p/e peer median. Our $117 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Analysts: $110–$137. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 3% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 8%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 3 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.09x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated fragile grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 65% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.07 → $1.17 (+9.1% / 30d). 18 raised, 0 cut, 22 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 3 maintained. 65% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 6.7% above current price.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$131.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$243.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,357.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show if Cisco meets its non-GAAP EPS goals.
Confirms:Cisco reports non-GAAP EPS above $0.80 for Q3.
Disproves:Non-GAAP EPS falls below $0.70 for Q3.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for CSCO yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 13, 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) reported its results of operations for its fiscal third quarter 2026 ended April 25, 2026. A copy of the press release issued by Cisco concerning the foregoing results is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1. The information contained herein and in the accompanying exhibit shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cisco, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any ge…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$110.00 – $137.00 (median $127.50) · 10 analysts · as of 2026-06-12
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Communications Equipment.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
CSCO Cisco | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | full | moderate |
ANET Arista Networks | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 69 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
LITE Lumentum | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 38 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
MSI Motorola Solutions | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 81 of 100 | fair | moderate |
CIEN Ciena | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
15 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=793).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 8 guided quarters · 35.0% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Cisco aims to increase its revenue for fiscal year 2026.
Cisco aims to maintain its non-GAAP EPS for fiscal year 2026.
Cisco is restructuring to invest in growth areas like silicon, optics, security, and AI.
Cisco is undergoing an executive leadership transition.
Why it matters: Falling below this EPS target may show problems in keeping profits.
Confirms:Non-GAAP EPS reported at or above $1.01.
Disproves:Non-GAAP EPS reported below $1.00.
Why it matters: A revenue miss would signal weakening demand and impact Cisco's growth outlook.
Confirms:Q2 FY 2026 revenue guidance below $15 billion.
Disproves:Q2 FY 2026 revenue guidance at or above $15 billion.
Why it matters: Revenue growth is a key priority for Cisco. It shows overall business health and market position.
Confirms:Cisco reports quarterly revenue growth above 5% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth is below 0% year over year. This may show potential issues.
Why it matters: Higher costs can hurt profits. They may show problems with growth plans.
Confirms:Restructuring costs are over $1 billion.
Disproves:Restructuring costs remain at or below $1 billion.
Why it matters: Slower growth in orders could indicate a decline in demand for Cisco's products.
Confirms:Product orders growth below 10% year over year.
Disproves:Product orders growth remains at or above 10% year over year.
Why it matters: Updates on the restructuring plan will show how Cisco invests in key areas like AI.
Confirms:Cisco shares news about new partnerships. They focus on AI, silicon, and security.
Disproves:No new updates or delays in the restructuring plan are reported.
Why it matters: Strong demand for AI Infrastructure can help growth. It supports Cisco's strategy.
Confirms:AI Infrastructure orders exceed $1 billion in Q2 FY 2026.
Disproves:AI Infrastructure orders fall below $1 billion in Q2 FY 2026.
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. On May 13, 2026, Cisco announced a restructuring plan in order to allow it to invest in key growth opportunities including silicon, optics, security and artificial intelligence (AI). Cisco currently estimates that it will recognize pre-tax charges to its GAAP financial results of up to $1 billion consisting of severance and other one-time termination benefits, and other costs. These charges are primarily cash-based. Cisco expects to recognize…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Appointment of Officer; Departure of Officer On April 27, 2026, M. Victoria Wong notified Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco") of her decision to retire as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Cisco effective May 19, 2026. Ms. Wong will remain employed by Cisco as an Executive Advisor through July 25, 2026. On April 27 , 2026, the Board o…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Departure of Director On March 31, 2026, in light of the increased time and focus required of his new role as Chief Executive Officer of Verizon Communications Inc., Daniel H. Schulman notified Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) of his decision to resign from the Board of Directors ("Board") of Cisco effective May 21, 2026. Appointment of Director On Ap…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 11, 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) reported its results of operations for its fiscal second quarter 2026 ended January 24, 2026. A copy of the press release issued by Cisco concerning the foregoing results is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1. The information contained herein and in the accompanying exhibit shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cisco, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless o…