Reading MSI? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MSI free→Reading MSI? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MSI free→NYSEInformation TechnologyCommunication EquipmentSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is also neutral, indicating some variability in cash backing reported profits. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, but the capital stance is capital unfriendly, which may raise concerns among investors. The sector backdrop is a tailwind, and compared with sector peers, MSI is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 10% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $404.89. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $412 MSI trades at 29× p/e, below its 39× p/e peer median. Our $464 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 10% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 68% for the rest of the cohort, n=3704).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.33x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2831).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $3.85 → $3.85 (-0.0% / 30d). 5 raised, 5 cut, 13 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 86% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$87.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$202.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,545.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Lower revenue growth could signal weakening demand and impact the full-year outlook.
Confirms:Q2 2026 revenue growth reported below 8.5% compared to Q2 2025.
Disproves:Q2 2026 revenue growth meets or exceeds 8.5% compared to Q2 2025.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advances: Expand Software and Services segment
New R&D facility supports software and services expansion.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition” and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. On May 7, 2026 Motorola Solutions, Inc. issued a press release announcing, among…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Communications Equipment.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
MSI Motorola Solutions | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 85 of 100 | fair | moderate |
CSCO Cisco | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | full | moderate |
ANET Arista Networks | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 70 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
LITE Lumentum | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 41 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
CIEN Ciena | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
14 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1040).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 4.5% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management aims to achieve $12.8 billion in revenue for the fiscal year 2026.
Focus on growing the Software and Services segment, which showed significant growth.
Continue disciplined capital allocation with dividends, share repurchases, and strategic acquisitions.
Why it matters: Growing backlog shows strong demand. This helps meet revenue goals.
Confirms:Backlog growth exceeds 10% year over year.
Disproves:Backlog growth falls below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: Better cash flow shows good management of money and operations.
Confirms:Operating cash flow exceeds $500 million in the next quarter.
Disproves:Operating cash flow remains below $400 million in the next quarter.
Why it matters: A slowdown in backlog growth could indicate reduced future sales and demand.
Confirms:Q1 2026 backlog growth reported below 11% year over year.
Disproves:Q1 2026 backlog growth meets or exceeds 11% year over year.
Why it matters: A growing backlog shows strong demand and good operations ahead.
Confirms:Backlog reported above $15.7 billion in the next earnings report.
Disproves:Backlog reported below $15.7 billion in the next earnings report.
Why it matters: Growth in this segment is crucial for overall revenue goals and reflects market demand.
Confirms:Software and Services revenue growth reported above 18% year over year.
Disproves:Software and Services revenue growth reported below 18% year over year.
Why it matters: Better use of capital can increase value for shareholders. It can also help growth.
Confirms:Management says the capital use score is over 70%.
Disproves:Management says the capital use score is under 70%.
Advances: Expand Software and Services segment
Partnership enhances software and services segment.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Motorola Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased to announce that on March 12, 2026, the size of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) was increased from eight to nine members and Peter A. Leav joined the Board as a director and a member of the Compensation and Leadership Committee, effective immediately after the conclusion of the…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition” and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. On February 11, 2026 Motorola Solutions, Inc. issued a press release announcing, among other things, financial results for the quarter and year ended Decem…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Motorola Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased to announce that on November 18, 2025, the size of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) was increased from seven to eight members and Dr. Mark E. Lashier joined the Board as a director and a member of the Governance and Nominating Committee, effective immediately. Dr. Lashier will s…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition” and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. On October 30, 2025 Motorola Solutions, Inc. issued a press release announcing, a…