Reading AISP? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AISP free→Reading AISP? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AISP free→
NASDAQInformation TechnologySoftware - InfrastructureSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is fragile, reported profits aren't backed by cash. Management's recent track record has been steady, but risk is high, and the company is priced below typical for the sector. Peer multiples imply a price roughly in line with where it trades (about fair); the read is fair, but weakening, as recent financials or earnings quality are weakening. If AISP cuts guidance on the next call, that would be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 1 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $2.81. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $3.01 AISP trades at 5× p/s, in line with its 4× p/s peer median. Our $2.42 fair value reflects that, medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 24% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated weak grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted -1.04x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated fragile grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 65% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.00 → $-0.03. 0 raised, 1 cut, 1 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 100% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$323.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$793.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $7,034.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
As of June 15, 2026, the valuation dimension changed and rose, with the valuation label shifting from "full" to "fair." The sector backdrop remains a tailwind, while risk is high. The company's earnings quality is fragile, and management is stable.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This would signal a slowdown in Airship AI's growth amid a decelerating sector.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported above 5% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for AISP yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
is incorporated herein by reference. The information in Items 2.02 and 7.01 (including Exhibit 99.1) are “furnished” and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of such section nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such f…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Systems Software.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
AISP Airship AI Holdings, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 26 of 100 | full | high |
MSFT Microsoft | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 83 of 100 | full | moderate |
PANW Palo Alto Networks | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 43 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
CRWD CrowdStrike | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 31 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
FTNT Fortinet | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
Not enough signal yet.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on leveraging growing momentum in long-term business development efforts funded through the OB3.
Stated in 2 of last 2 quarters. Despite the focus on long-term business development, revenue decreased from $6.49M in 2025-Q4 to $6.35M in 2026-Q1. Persistent statement, limited substantive delivery this quarter.
“Capitalize on growing momentum in the current fiscal year around long-term business development efforts.”
“Capitalize on growing momentum coming out of Q4 into the new fiscal year around long-term business development efforts.”
Target positive cash flow for the calendar year 2025 supported by a strong pipeline.
Newly stated in 2025-Q2. Despite the target for positive cash flow in 2025, cash from operating activities was -$3.50M in 2025-Q4, indicating limited progress towards this goal.
is incorporated herein by reference. The information in Items 2.02 and 7.01 (including Exhibit 99.1) are “furnished” and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of such section nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such f…
is incorporated herein by reference. The information in Items 2.02 and 7.01 (including Exhibit 99.1) are “furnished” and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of such section nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such f…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On October 8, 2025, Airship AI, Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into warrant exercise inducement offer letter (the “Inducement Letter”) with the holder (the “Holder”) of its existing common stock warrants exercisable for an aggregate of 2,162,162 shares of its common stock (collectively, the “Existing Warrants”), to exercise its Existing Warrants at the existing exercise price of $4.50 per share, in exchange for the Company’s agreement to iss…
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities. The Company issued the Existing Warrants pursuant to the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act available under Section 4(a)(2) and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder and intends to issue the Inducement Warrants pursuant to the same exemption or pursuant to the exemption provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act. The description of the Inducement Warrants under
“30% revenue growth and positive cash flow for calendar year 2025 supported by a strong and validated pipeline.”