Arteris, Inc. (AIP)
NASDAQInformation TechnologySemiconductorsSnapshot 2026-09-14
$20.61-9.17%
Close 2026-09-14 · 1-day change
NASDAQInformation TechnologySemiconductorsSnapshot 2026-09-14
Research Workspace
Put AIP beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Semiconductors is in supercycle. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
The reason to own it still holds.
View ThesisRevenue growth is accelerating — up about 34% over the past year.
View GrowthManagement screens weak on capital allocation, earnings delivery, market reaction to earnings.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is highly volatile — it swings about 3% on a typical day and fell roughly 58% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskAIP's growth has to keep compounding to justify the price. Revenue grew 46% year over year, and the last quarter beat expectations. It trades at 12.7× P/S versus an 8.3× peer median, indicating the price reflects less growth than we forecast. If AIP cuts guidance on the next call, that's a meaningful negative. Peer multiples imply a price about 17% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis). Our read remains intact.
Trailing returns as of 2026-09-14. AIP is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 6 analysts currently covering AIP (as of Sep 2026).
Based on 3 Wall Street analysts offering 12-month price targets for AIP in the last 4 months.
Continue this research
Compare AIP with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Free account required to save the handoff. No credit card.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIP Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 4 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-09-14. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Semiconductors — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Our valuation methods disagree too much on this name right now. Rather than print a number we don't believe, we're holding it back until they converge.
Our valuation methods disagree too much on this name right now. Rather than print a number we don't believe, we're holding it back until they converge.
Compare the value case
Put AIP next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Advances: Improve operating income
Upgrade indicates improved profitability outlook.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-09-14. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
Current $20.61
The last 12 months of price, then the range of analyst 12-month targets from today’s $20.61.
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Below average on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
Advances: Achieve revenue growth
Increased revenue outlook supports growth objective.
Advances: Achieve revenue growth
Analyst rating supports revenue growth expectations.
Partnership enhances growth potential in AI and HPC markets.
Partnership enhances growth potential through technology deployment.
Advances: Achieve revenue growth
Licensing agreement boosts revenue growth potential significantly.
Advances: Achieve revenue growth
Highlights revenue growth potential from AI spending.
Advances: Achieve revenue growth
Directly aligns with revenue growth goal.