Reading AI? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AI free→Reading AI? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AI free→
NYSEInformation TechnologySoftware - InfrastructureSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, and the capital stance is capital-friendly. Risk is elevated, and compared with sector peers, it is below typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 58% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk, as it trades below peer multiples, but recent financials are weak. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $11.03. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $11 AI trades at 5× p/s, in line with its 5× p/s peer median. Our $26 fair value reflects that, low confidence. Analysts: $6.00–$12. Not investment advice.
(median $7.00) · 8 analysts · as of 2026-06-04
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 58% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -15%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated weak grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.29x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
8 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1040).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.00 → $-0.25. 8 raised, 4 cut, 14 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 7 maintained. 7% of analysts rate Buy.
3 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target -10.1% above current price.
1 positive, 0 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$204.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$579.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $7,339.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Cutting operating losses is very important. This shows better control of costs.
Confirms:Operating losses went down by over 10% from the last quarter.
Disproves:Operating losses increase or stay the same compared to the previous quarter.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for AI yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On June 3, 2026, C3.ai, Inc. (the “ Company ”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the fiscal fourth quarter and the full fiscal year ended April 30, 2026. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The information contained in this
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Systems Software.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
AI C3.ai, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 25 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
MSFT Microsoft | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 84 of 100 | full | moderate |
PANW Palo Alto Networks | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 42 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
CRWD CrowdStrike | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 31 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
FTNT Fortinet | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management aims to reduce operating losses through cost control and efficiency improvements.
Management is focused on improving cash flow from operations to enhance financial stability.
Management aims to increase gross profit margins through strategic initiatives.
Why it matters: Improving cash flow shows better financial health. It supports future growth plans.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations turns positive for the quarter.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations remains negative for the quarter.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth signals a slowdown in the tech sector. This could impact C3.ai's performance.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth falls below its median for two consecutive months.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth stays above its median for the same period.
Why it matters: Higher gross profit margins indicate better pricing or cost control. This can boost profitability.
Confirms:Gross profit margins increase by more than 5% compared to the previous quarter.
Disproves:Gross profit margins decrease or stay the same compared to the previous quarter.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Appointment of Chief Executive Officer The Board of Directors (the “ Board ”) of the Company unanimously appointed Thomas M. Siebel as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, effective May 8, 2026. Stephen Ehikian, who had been serving as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer since September 2025, will serve as the Company’…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 12, 2026, C3.ai, Inc. (the “ Company ”) issued a press release announcing certain preliminary results for the Company’s fiscal fourth quarter and full fiscal year ended April 30, 2026. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The information contained in this
Other Events. Ruling on Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action Complaint As previous disclosed, a putative securities class action complaint (captioned The Reckstin Family Trust v. C3.ai, Inc. et al. , No. 4:22-cv-01413-HSG) was filed on March 4, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against C3.ai, Inc. (the “Company”) and certain current and former officers and directors. On March 12, 2026, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part t…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 25, 2026, C3.ai, Inc. (the “ Company ”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the fiscal third quarter ended January 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The information contained in this