National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA)
NYSEReal EstateReit - IndustrialSnapshot 2026-10-29
NYSEReal EstateReit - IndustrialSnapshot 2026-10-29
Research Workspace
Put NSA beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Management is running behind on a stated commitment.
View ThesisRevenue is contracting — down about 2% over the past year.
View GrowthMiddle-of-the-pack quality for its industry.
View QualityMiddle-of-the-pack management execution.
View ManagementExpectations look high — the market is pricing in about 22% growth a year, above the roughly 2% analysts expect, leaving little room for error.
View ValuationRelatively steady — typically moves about 1% a day.
View RiskNSA’s case rests on steady self-storage earnings, though revenue growth is nearly flat. Its latest quarter beat earnings consensus, but revenue grew only 0.2% year over year. No valuation bridge or priced-in assessment is available, so the desk cannot define the market’s growth expectations. The model puts next-quarter miss probability at 25%. Management is running behind on a stated commitment, creating a specific thesis risk. Our standing thesis is on watch; this read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-07-22. NSA is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 3 Wall Street analysts offering 12-month price targets for NSA in the last 4 months.
Current $43.41
The last 12 months of price, then the range of analyst 12-month targets from today’s $43.41.
Continue this research
Compare NSA with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSA Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 0 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-29. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Real Estate (broad) — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put NSA next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-07-22. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Bottom 25% on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.