Innovative Solutions and Support Inc (ISSC)
NASDAQIndustrialsAerospace & DefenseSnapshot 2026-10-29
NASDAQIndustrialsAerospace & DefenseSnapshot 2026-10-29
Research Workspace
Put ISSC beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
The reason to own it still holds.
View ThesisRevenue is growing steadily — about 20% over the past year.
View GrowthMiddle-of-the-pack management execution.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is highly volatile — it swings about 2% on a typical day and fell roughly 49% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskISSC’s case rests on steady financial performance, a latest-quarter earnings beat, and cash-backed profits. Q3 FY2026 revenue grew 10.7% year over year, while non-GAAP earnings beat consensus. No valuation bridge or priced-in assessment is available to show what expectations the price reflects. Our model puts the next-quarter miss probability near 20%. The sector backdrop is a drag, and the market cycle is marked Mania. Our read remains intact; this read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-09-14. ISSC is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 4 analysts currently covering ISSC (as of Aug 2026).
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
Continue this research
Compare ISSC with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISSC Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 0 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-29. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Aerospace & Defense — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Our valuation methods disagree too much on this name right now. Rather than print a number we don't believe, we're holding it back until they converge.
Compare the value case
Put ISSC next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Advances: Improve gross margin profile above mid-40% range
Record margins indicate strong gross margin improvement.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-09-14. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Top 10% on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
