Reading DOUG? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DOUG free→Reading DOUG? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DOUG free→
NYSEReal EstateReal Estate ServicesSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality is fragile, and management's track record is steady. Risk is high, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, DOUG trades below typical levels. Peer multiples imply a price about 35% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk, as it trades below peer multiples while earnings quality is fragile. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 3 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $1.74. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $1.74 DOUG trades at 13× p/e, below its 19× p/e peer median. Our $2.68 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 35% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -10%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Real Estate names rated neutral grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1968).
Over the trailing year it converted -5.60x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Real Estate names rated fragile grew net income 35% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=1399).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
via XLRE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$231.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$631.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,984.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The earnings report will show if the company can improve its weak financial status.
Confirms:The earnings report shows a big rise in revenue or profit margins from past quarters.
Disproves:The earnings report shows ongoing losses or falling revenue.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for DOUG yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this Current Report on Form 8-K and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto are being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Real Estate Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
DOUG Douglas Elliman, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 7 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
CBRE CBRE Group | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | fair | moderate |
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 96 of 100 | fair | moderate |
CSGP CoStar Group | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
COMP Compass, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 40 of 100 | fair | elevated |
7 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Real Estate names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=5004).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management aims to improve revenue performance despite recent declines.
Newly stated in 2026-Q1. Revenue was $214.3M in 2026-Q1, down from $245.4M in 2025-Q4, indicating a decline. Management highlighted that despite the year-over-year decline, revenues exceeded those of the first quarters in 2024 and 2023, suggesting a focus on reversing the recent downward trend.
“revenues declined year-over-year but exceeded first quarter revenues in both 2024 and 2023”
Management is focused on turning negative cash flow from operations into positive.
Newly stated in 2026-Q1. Cash from operations was -$19.3M in 2026-Q1, reflecting a negative cash flow situation. Management's focus is on reversing this trend to achieve positive cash flow from operations, but progress is limited so far.
Why it matters: If revenue growth speeds up, it may help Douglas Elliman's weak position in the market.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth increases back toward 10% year over year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth stays below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: More unemployment claims may show economic weakness. This can lower demand for real estate.
Confirms:Unemployment claims rise well above 300,000.
Disproves:Unemployment claims stay steady or drop below 250,000.
Regulation FD Disclosure. As previously disclosed, on November 14, 2025, a Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint, Barbara Strougo derivatively on behalf of Douglas Elliman, Inc. vs. Howard M. Lorber, et al. (the “Strougo Litigation”), was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Court”) on behalf of Douglas Elliman Inc. (the “Company”), as nominal defendant, against certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers (the “Individual Defendants”). The c…
Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant Dismissal of Current Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm On April 6, 2026, Douglas Elliman Inc. (the “Company”) dismissed Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as the Company’s independent registered certified public accounting firm, effective April 6, 2026, in order to change the Company’s principal accountant. The decision to change principal accountants was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) on the recom…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers Amendment to Executive Employment Agreements with each of J. Bryant Kirkland III and Bradley H. Brodie On April 10, 2026, Douglas Elliman Inc. (the “Company”) entered into an amendment to its employment agreement with each of J. Bryant Kirkland III, the Company’s Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (the “ Kirkland Amendme…
of this Current Report on Form 8-K and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto are being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
“Cash from operations was negative at -$19.3M”