Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK)
NYSEReal EstateReal Estate - ServicesSnapshot 2026-10-30
NYSEReal EstateReal Estate - ServicesSnapshot 2026-10-30
Research Workspace
Put CWK beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Real Estate is in steady. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
Management is running behind on a stated commitment.
View ThesisRevenue growth is accelerating — up about 11% over the past year.
View GrowthMiddle-of-the-pack quality for its industry.
View QualityManagement screens strong on capital allocation, margins, the balance sheet.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is volatile — it swings about 2% on a typical day and fell roughly 36% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskCWK’s case rests on revenue growth across its service lines, despite fragile cash backing and steady recent performance. Revenue grew 11% year over year in both reported quarters, but the latest quarter missed EPS consensus. CWK trades at 10× P/E versus a 19× peer median; expectations look modest versus our view. The 29% next-quarter miss probability and reported profits weakly backed by cash threaten that case. Management is also running behind on a stated commitment. Peer multiples imply a price about 52% above where it trades; the thesis is on watch, and this read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-10-30. CWK is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 12 analysts currently covering CWK (as of Oct 2026).
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
Continue this research
Compare CWK with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWK Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 9 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-30. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Real Estate Services — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put CWK next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Threatens: Drive revenue growth across all service lines
Net leasing decline impacts revenue growth objective.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-10-30. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Below average on quality vs scored peers
A second lens on the 12-month fair value: for companies that score high on measured quality (profitability, balance-sheet safety, earnings stability), this read trusts more of today's profit margins instead of averaging them toward their multi-year history the way the headline number does. Shown alongside the fair value above, not in place of it. A diagnostic, not a price target or a buy/sell signal.
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.

Threatens: Drive revenue growth across all service lines
Significant decline in leasing impacts revenue growth.
Advances: Optimize capital structure and reduce cost of capital
Upgrade reflects improved capital structure and reduced cost of capital.

Advances: Drive revenue growth across all service lines
Increased demand supports revenue growth across service lines.

Threatens: Drive revenue growth across all service lines
Retail leasing decline impacts revenue growth across service lines.

Advances: Drive revenue growth across all service lines
New market opportunity aligns with revenue growth objective.

Advances: Optimize capital structure and reduce cost of capital
Debt reduction enhances capital structure and reduces cost of capital.

Leadership change may disrupt financial reporting and operations.
