Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF)
NYSEMaterialsSteelSnapshot 2026-10-30
NYSEMaterialsSteelSnapshot 2026-10-30
Research Workspace
Put CLF beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Materials: fringe margins under pressure (0q confirmed)
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
The reason to own it still holds.
View ThesisRevenue is growing steadily — about 8% over the past year.
View GrowthRanks in the weakest quality tier of its industry — roughly the bottom 19%, softest on free-cash-flow margins.
View QualityManagement screens weak on capital allocation, the balance sheet, market reaction to earnings.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is volatile — it swings about 2% on a typical day and fell roughly 48% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskCLF’s case rests on improving operating profits, despite recent unprofitable results. Revenue growth is unclear, and Q3 2026 earnings beat estimates. CLF trades at 0.4× sales versus the 1.4× peer median. The price reflects less growth than our forecast. Stelco plant idling tied to tariffs could hurt production and profits. Our model puts next-quarter miss risk near 23%. Peer multiples imply a price about 5% above where it trades. This read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-10-30. CLF is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 14 analysts currently covering CLF (as of Oct 2026).
Based on 7 Wall Street analysts offering 12-month price targets for CLF in the last 4 months.
Continue this research
Compare CLF with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLF Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 4 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-30. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Steel — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put CLF next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Retaining Stelco amid a government jobs dispute may constrain strategic options and add integration or regulatory risk.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-10-30. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
Current $14.25
The last 12 months of price, then the range of analyst 12-month targets from today’s $14.25.
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Below average on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
Company confirmation of Stelco undertaking compliance reduces regulatory uncertainty.
Advances: Improve earnings and operating profitability
Upbeat Q3 results support improving profitability and operating performance.

Advances: Improve earnings and operating profitability
Record post-takeover quarter indicates Stelco earnings strength, though layoffs add context.

Advances: Improve earnings and operating profitability
Q4 EBITDA outlook and 2027 earnings path materially strengthen the profitability outlook.

Advances: Improve earnings and operating profitability
Bumper 2027 profit forecast materially improves the forward earnings case.
Advances: Improve earnings and operating profitability
Q3 earnings beat provides evidence of stronger profitability.

Electrical-steel expansion update supports higher-value product growth, though scale is limited.
