Reading TTD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TTD free→Reading TTD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TTD free→
NASDAQCommunication ServicesAdvertising AgenciesSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is mixed, and risk is elevated, while the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, TTD is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 31% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $18.96. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $19 TTD trades at 13× p/e, below its 19× p/e peer median. Our $26 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Analysts: $20–$35. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 27% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 20%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired. Regime (Crisis) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Communication Services names rated strong grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=701).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.53x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Communication Services names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 48% for the rest of the cohort, n=690).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.46 → $0.40 (-13.2% / 30d). 0 raised, 18 cut, 21 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 37% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Divergence: fundamentals are strong but estimates are being cut. Worth reading the recent material events.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$247.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$552.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $7,894.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Fixing compliance issues is key to keeping listing status and investor trust.
Confirms:The Trade Desk fixes Nasdaq compliance issues and keeps its listing.
Disproves:Nasdaq takes more steps about delisting or compliance problems.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for TTD yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
No upside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
No downside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On June 1, 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. (the “Company”) announced the appointment of Nate Olmstead, age 54, as the Company’s chief financial officer. Mr. Olmstead’s appointment as the Company’s chief financial officer will be effective as of July 9, 2026. Mr. Olmstead will replace Tahnil Davis, who is acting as the Company’s interim chief financial o…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$20.00 – $35.00 (median $26.00) · 22 analysts · as of 2026-05-11
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Advertising.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
TTD Trade Desk (The) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 81 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
OMC Omnicom Group | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
MGNI Magnite, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 88 of 100 | expensive | high |
ZD Ziff Davis | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 42 of 100 | fair | elevated |
STGW Stagwell, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 47 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
22 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Communication Services names rated volatile grew net income 60% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=200).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLC
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on expanding market share in the global advertising sector through innovation and partnerships.
Enhance support for Unified ID 2.0 to improve advertising relevance and user privacy.
Continue the share repurchase program to return value to shareholders.
Why it matters: Meeting or exceeding this guidance shows strong demand and growth momentum. It reflects the company's ability to capture market share.
Confirms:Q2 revenue reported at or above $750 million.
Disproves:Q2 revenue reported below $700 million.
Why it matters: Hitting or beating revenue goals shows strong demand and growth in ad tech.
Confirms:Q4 2025 revenue reported at or above $840 million.
Disproves:Q4 2025 revenue reported below $840 million.
Why it matters: Working on UID2 partnerships is important. It helps stay relevant in advertising.
Confirms one read:New partnerships support Unified ID 2.0.
Confirms the other:No new partnerships or support for Unified ID 2.0 announced.
Why it matters: High retention shows customers are happy. This loyalty is important for future growth.
Confirms:Customer retention rate is 95% or higher.
Disproves:Customer retention rate drops below 90%.
Why it matters: Big buybacks show good use of money and trust in the company.
Confirms:The company will announce buybacks over $150 million next quarter.
Disproves:No big buybacks are announced next quarter.
Why it matters: Olmstead's leadership can boost growth and help the company make more money.
Confirms:Positive changes in financial numbers or new plans came after Olmstead started.
Disproves:There are no clear improvements in financial numbers or plans after the change.
Why it matters: Active share repurchases show management believes in the company's value. This can help stock price.
Confirms:Share repurchases of at least $100 million announced for Q2.
Disproves:No share repurchases announced or much lower amounts.
Class III director and Audit Committee member — David Haddad: The company appointed a new director and audit committee member.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On May 24, 2026, the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) approved Samantha Jacobson’s eligibility to participate in the Company’s non-employee director compensation program (the “Program”). Pursuant to the Program, Ms. Jacobson will be entitled to receive annual compensation of $50,000 for her service on the Board. Additionally, pursuant to…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 7, 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto is intended to be furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On May 7, 2026, Samantha Jacobson provided The Trade Desk, Inc. (the “Company”) notice of her intent to resign as the Company’s Chief Strategy Officer, effective May 18, 2026. Ms. Jacobson will continue to serve as a member of the Company’s board of directors. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the regis…