Reading TRC? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TRC free→Reading TRC? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TRC free→
NYSEIndustrialsConglomeratesSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, while earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been steady, and risk is moderate. The sector backdrop is a headwind, and compared with sector peers, TRC is below typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 412% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich. This analysis is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 1 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $19.03. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $19, TRC's earnings are too small for P/E to mean much; on sales it trades at 10× p/s (5.4× the 2× p/s peer median). That gap is an optionality premium a financial-multiple model can't price — our $3.59 fair value covers only the as-is business, low confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 438% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated weak grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=3678).
Over the trailing year it converted 6.38x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated robust grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3333).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, the broad stock market, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.02 → $0.02 (+0.0% / 30d). 0 raised, 0 cut, 1 covering analysts.
via XLI
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$90.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$202.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,941.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Retail sales can indicate demand trends. Strong sales may boost confidence in the sector.
Confirms:Retail sales increase by more than 1% month over month.
Disproves:Retail sales decrease by more than 1% month over month.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for TRC yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 7, 2026, the Tejon Ranch Co. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing its first quarter 2026 financial results (the “Press Release”). A copy of the Press Release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K (including the exhibit attached as Exhibit 99.1 hereto) is being furnished pursuant to
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Industrial Conglomerates.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
TRC Tejon Ranch Co. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 21 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
HON Honeywell | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | full | low |
MMM 3M | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 71 of 100 | fair | moderate |
CSL Carlisle Companies | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | fair | moderate |
SEB Seaboard Corp | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated stable grew net income 60% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=792).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Continue pursuing commercial and industrial development, multifamily development, leasing, and investment activity.
Address elevated production costs in farming operations, including fuel, fertilizer, pest control, and labor.
Why it matters: The earnings report will show if losses are improving or worsening. This affects investor confidence.
Confirms:Earnings report shows a smaller loss than the previous quarter.
Disproves:Earnings report shows a larger loss than the previous quarter.
Why it matters: The industrial sector is slowing. If growth re-accelerates, it may help Tejon Ranch.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth rate rises above 5% year over year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth rate falls below 5% year over year.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On March 19, 2026, the Tejon Ranch Co. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing its fourth quarter and full year 2025 operating and financial results (the “Press Release”). A copy of the Press Release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K (including the exhibit attached as Exhibit 99.1 hereto) is being furnished pursuant to
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On March 9, 2026, Tejon Ranch Co. (“Company”) Director Kenneth G. Yee informed the Company that he will not stand for reelection at the 2026 annual meeting, upon completing his current term as a director at the 2026 annual meeting. The Board thanks Director Yee for his service to the Company. In connection therewith and pursuant to authority confer…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On November 6, 2025, the Tejon Ranch Co. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing its results of operations for the three and nine-months ended September 30, 2025 (the “Press Release”). A copy of the Press Release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K (including the exhibit attached as Exhibit 99.1 hereto) is being furnished pursuant to
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements with Certain Officers. On February 10, 2025 Tejon Ranch Co.’s (the “Company”) Board of Directors (“Board”) unanimously appointed Matthew H. Walker (“Walker”) to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and approved a compensatory contract for Mr. Walker (“Agreement”). These actions and the material components of the Agreement were disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-…