Reading RCMT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track RCMT free→Reading RCMT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track RCMT free→
NASDAQIndustrialsConglomeratesSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality is fragile, reported profits aren't backed by cash. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, though the capital stance is capital unfriendly. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may affect performance compared to sector peers that are above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 48% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk, as it trades below peer multiples while earnings quality is fragile. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $26.03. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $26 RCMT trades at 11× p/e, below its 23× p/e peer median. Our $50 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 48% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 6%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated strong grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=3696).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.31x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated fragile grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=3333).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates, the US dollar.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.72 → $0.70 (-3.4% / 30d). 0 raised, 1 cut, 1 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 100% of analysts rate Buy.
Divergence: fundamentals are strong but estimates are being cut. Worth reading the recent material events.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$170.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$400.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,616.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This report can indicate consumer spending trends. Strong retail sales may suggest better demand for RCM's services.
Confirms one read:Retail sales rise a lot in the report compared to earlier months.
Confirms the other:Retail sales drop a lot or stay the same.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for RCMT yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant. (a) Previous Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. (i) On April 29, 2026, RCM Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) dismissed EisnerAmper LLP (“Eisner”) as its independent registered public accounting firm. (ii) Eisner’s audit report on the consolidated financial statements of the Company and subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2026 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Industrial Conglomerates.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
RCMT RCM Technologies, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
HON Honeywell | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 66 of 100 | full | low |
MMM 3M | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 68 of 100 | fair | moderate |
CSL Carlisle Companies | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 63 of 100 | fair | moderate |
SEB Seaboard Corp | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
7 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=1113).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management emphasizes consistent growth across all three segments to build towards a strong second half of the year.
Management aims to achieve the highest quarterly gross profit and adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2025.
Management is focused on improving cash flow from operations to support business growth.
Why it matters: If industrial sector revenue growth picks up, it could boost RCM's performance. This may improve overall market sentiment.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth speeds up to 5% or more.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth keeps slowing below current levels.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition” (including the exhibit) shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be incorporated by reference in any filing made by the Registrant pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, other than to the extent that such filing incorporates by reference any or all of such information by express reference thereto.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On February 20, 2026, RCM Technologies, Inc. (the “ Company ”) and all of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “ Borrowers ”) entered into Amendment No. 1 (“ Amendment No. 1 ”) to the Fifth Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2024 (the “ Fifth Amended and Restated Loan Agreement ”), with Citizens Bank, N.A., as lender (in such capacity, the “ Lender ”) and as administrative agent and arranger (in such capacity, the “ Administr…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant The information set forth in
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers On December 18, 2025, as disclosed in