Reading TER? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TER free→Reading TER? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TER free→NASDAQInformation TechnologySemiconductor Equipment & MaterialsSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality is fragile, reported profits aren't backed by cash. Management's recent track record has been neutral, and risk is elevated. The sector backdrop is a tailwind, and compared with sector peers, TER is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 40% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified, as it is rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and sector trends from bellwethers like ASML and LRCX.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $409.35. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $432 TER trades at 75× p/e, in line with its 63× p/e peer median. Our $304 fair value reflects that, low confidence. Analysts: $350–$440. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 42% near-term growth, ahead of our forecast of about 18%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=889): about 49% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 85% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 3 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.91x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated fragile grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 65% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.04 → $2.05 (+0.6% / 30d). 1 raised, 0 cut, 16 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 63% of analysts rate Buy.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$300.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$543.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,673.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation label changed from 'expensive' to 'full'.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Lower guidance means weaker demand than expected. This will hurt growth.
Confirms:Q2 revenue guidance is set below $1,150 million.
Disproves:Q2 revenue guidance meets or exceeds $1,150 million.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Partnership may enhance revenue growth and market position.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 28, 2026, Teradyne, Inc. (“Teradyne”) issued a press release regarding its financial results for the first quarter ended March 29, 2026. Teradyne’s press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$350.00 – $440.00 (median $390.00) · 9 analysts · as of 2026-04-30
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Semiconductor Materials & Equipment.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
TER Teradyne | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | full | elevated |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | — | — | moderate |
LRCX Lam Research | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 70 of 100 | full | elevated |
AMAT Applied Materials | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 84 of 100 | full | elevated |
KLAC KLA Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 98 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
7 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1040).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 8 guided quarters · 17.3% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on growing revenue through strategic initiatives and market expansion.
Enhance gross profit through operational efficiencies and cost management.
Focus on increasing operating income through strategic cost controls and revenue growth.
Why it matters: Earnings below this level may show profit margin problems or demand issues.
Confirms:Q2 GAAP EPS is reported below $1.83.
Disproves:Q2 GAAP EPS meets or exceeds $1.83.
Why it matters: A drop in AI revenue may show weaker demand in an important growth area.
Confirms:AI revenue is less than 70% of total revenue.
Disproves:AI revenue is at or above 70% of total revenue.
Why it matters: A decline in gross profit margin could signal rising costs or pricing pressure.
Confirms:Gross profit margin falls below 60%.
Disproves:Gross profit margin remains at or above 60%.
Why it matters: If revenue growth is below this level, it means less demand for Teradyne's products.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth stays above 5% year over year.
Why it matters: AI demand growth is important for Teradyne's revenue and profit.
Confirms:Semiconductor Test revenue grows more than 25% each year.
Disproves:Semiconductor Test revenue falls each year or grows less than 10%.
Advances: Increase revenue
Significant contract boosts revenue growth potential.
AI chiplet test aligns with growth and innovation objectives.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 2, 2026, Teradyne, Inc. (“Teradyne”) issued a press release regarding its financial results for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2025. Teradyne’s press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On October 28, 2025, Teradyne, Inc. (the “Company” or “Teradyne”) announced that Michelle Turner will succeed Sanjay Mehta as its Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer, effective November 3, 2025 (the “Effective Date”). Ms. Turner will also serve as principal financial officer and principal accounting officer of Teradyne upon the E…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On October 28, 2025, Teradyne, Inc. (“Teradyne”) issued a press release regarding its financial results for the third quarter ended September 28, 2025. Teradyne’s press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On August 29, 2025, Ujjwal Kumar’s tenure as Teradyne, Inc.’s (the “Company”) President of Teradyne Robotics ended. Mr. Kumar will remain employed with the Company through September 30, 2025 to transition his responsibilities. In order to obtain a release of claims from Mr. Kumar and to receive the benefit of certain restrictive covenants, the Comp…