Reading MRTN? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MRTN free→Reading MRTN? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MRTN free→
NASDAQIndustrialsTruckingSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, while earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been steady, and risk is moderate. The sector backdrop is a headwind, and compared with sector peers, MRTN trades below typical levels. Peer multiples imply a price about 232% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich, as it trades above peer multiples, and the longer horizon does not make that back through growth. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 4 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $17.77. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $18 MRTN trades at 2× p/s, below its 2× p/s peer median. Our $5.35 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 232% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about -9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=4882).
Over the trailing year it converted 6.23x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated robust grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3333).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.07 → $0.07 (+0.7% / 30d). 0 raised, 1 cut, 1 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 50% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$118.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$315.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,200.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The earnings report will show details about revenue, costs, and overall financial health.
Confirms one read:Q2 earnings report shows revenue growth or better profits.
Confirms the other:Q2 earnings report reveals further declines in revenue or net income.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for MRTN yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers On May 5, 2026, Marten Transport, Ltd.’s (the “Company’s”) Compensation Committee approved an increase to the base salary for each of the Company’s named executive officers listed below, retroactive to April 5, 2026. Effective April 5, 2026, the named executive officers will receive the following annual base salaries in the listed positions: Name and Position as of May 5, 2026 Former Base Salary Base…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Cargo Ground Transportation.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
MRTN Marten Transport, Ltd. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 24 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
ODFL Old Dominion | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 61 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
JBHT J.B. Hunt | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 56 of 100 | full | moderate |
XPO XPO, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 58 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
KNX Knight-Swift | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 31 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated stable grew net income 60% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=792).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on minimizing freight market impact through cost controls and data-driven efficiencies.
Continue the commitment to a consistent dividend payout of $0.06 per share.
Focus on enhancing cash flow from operating activities to support growth and investment.
Aim to stabilize net income amidst fluctuating revenue and operating conditions.
Why it matters: More cash from operations means better liquidity and efficiency. This helps with future investments.
Confirms:Cash from operating activities exceeds $33.05M in Q2.
Disproves:Cash from operating activities drops below $33.05M in Q2.
Why it matters: Keeping the dividend shows a commitment to giving value to shareholders. It can affect investor feelings.
Confirms:Q2 dividend payout remains at $0.06 per share.
Disproves:Q2 dividend payout is cut below $0.06 per share.
Why it matters: Stabilizing net income would show that cost controls are working despite market pressures. This could improve investor confidence.
Confirms:Net income for Q2 reaches or exceeds $2 million.
Disproves:Net income drops below $1 million. This shows ongoing financial strain.
Why it matters: Lower operating expenses compared to revenue shows better cost management. This can help make more money.
Confirms:Operating costs as a percentage of revenue fall below 98% in Q2.
Disproves:Operating costs as a percentage of revenue go above 99.2%.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 23, 2026, the company issued a press release announcing financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. Attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 is a copy of the company’s press release dated April 23, 2026 announcing the company’s financial results for this period. The press release also includes a discussion of operating revenue, net of fuel surcharge revenue; and operating expenses as a percentage of operating revenue, with both amount…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On October 23, 2025, the company issued a press release announcing financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2025. Attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 is a copy of the company’s press release dated October 23, 2025 announcing the company’s financial results for this period. The press release also includes a discussion of operating revenue, net of fuel surcharge revenue; and operating expenses as a percentage of operating revenue, with bot…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Timothy M. Kohl Separation Agreement As previously announced in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Marten Transport, Ltd. (the “Company”), dated August 19, 2025, the Company announced that Timothy M. Kohl, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, notified the Company that he will retire from the Company as of the close of business on September…