Reading MGLD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MGLD free→Reading MGLD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MGLD free→
AMEXFinancialsAsset ManagementSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been steady, but risk is high, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 34% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk, as it trades below peer multiples while recent financials are weak. Key factors to watch include any potential guidance cuts from MGLD and the performance of sector bellwethers like BLK, BX, and KKR. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $1.16. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $1.16 MGLD trades at 2× p/s, below its 3× p/s peer median. Our $1.61 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 28% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 3%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated weak grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=3730).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.35x of net income into operating cash flow.
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, the broad stock market, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Financials names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=3736).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$255.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$1,011.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,397.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Signal changed from 'mixed' to 'mild_favorable'.
As of June 15, 2026, the valuation dimension changed and became inexpensive. The sector backdrop remained a headwind, and risk remained high. The recent financial performance was weak, and earnings quality was noted as loss-making. The management dimension was stable.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A drop below the median would signal a slowdown in the financial sector's growth phase.
Confirms:Revenue growth is below 12% year over year. This shows a big slowdown.
Disproves:Revenue growth remains at or above 12% year over year, showing continued strength.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for MGLD yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
No upside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
No downside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 11, 2026, The Marygold Companies, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial results for the three month and nine month periods ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such exhibit and the information set forth therein and in this
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Asset Management & Custody Banks.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
MGLD Marygold Companies Inc/The | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 43 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
BLK BlackRock | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 63 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
BX Blackstone Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 26 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
BNY BNY Mellon | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 57 of 100 | full | low |
BK BNY Mellon | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 100 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
No qualifying priorities for this snapshot. Check back after the next refresh.
Why it matters: Interest rates change borrowing costs. They also affect how much consumers spend.
Confirms one read:FOMC raises interest rates. This shows a tighter monetary policy.
Confirms the other:FOMC keeps or lowers interest rates. This suggests a more relaxed approach.
Why it matters: Retail sales data affects how much people spend. This impacts financial performance.
Confirms one read:Retail sales go up by more than 0.5% month over month. This shows stronger spending.
Confirms the other:Retail sales drop by more than 0.5% month over month. This signals weaker demand.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 5, 2026, The Marygold Companies, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial results for the three month and six month periods ended December 31, 2025. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such exhibit and the information set forth therein and in this
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On November 7, 2025, The Marygold Companies, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial results for the three months ended September 30, 2025. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such exhibit and the information set forth therein and in this
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On September 19, 2025, The Marygold Companies, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial results for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such exhibit and the information set forth therein and in this
of the Form 8-K and Brigadier is not deemed a “significant” subsidiary within the meaning set forth under Rule 11-02(b)(2) and Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X. Nevertheless, the Company is providing this disclosure voluntarily under