Reading BLK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track BLK free→Reading BLK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track BLK free→NYSEFinancialsAsset ManagementSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong. Earnings quality is fragile, and management's track record is volatile. The sector backdrop is a headwind, and risk is moderate. Peer multiples imply a price about 58% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified. This means it is rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $1052.83. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $1,044 the market pays 24× p/e — above the 15× p/e peer median but in line with its own 23× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $660 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $1,140–$1,393. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 58% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=889): about 49% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 85% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated strong grew net income 67% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3733).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.65x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated fragile grew net income 49% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $12.53 → $12.53 (-0.0% / 30d). 1 raised, 0 cut, 11 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 82% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 14.2% above current price.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$101.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$263.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,242.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Strong inflows show that clients trust BlackRock. This helps grow their asset management business.
Confirms:Total net inflows for the quarter are over $130 billion. This shows strong demand for products.
Disproves:Net inflows drop below $100 billion. This suggests clients are less interested.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Launch of new ETF aligns with growth strategy.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 14, 2026, BlackRock, Inc. (the “Company”) reported results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the earnings release issued by the Company is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$1140.00 – $1393.00 (median $1220.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-06-08
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Asset Management & Custody Banks.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
BLK BlackRock | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 60 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
BX Blackstone Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 24 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
BNY BNY Mellon | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | full | low |
BK BNY Mellon | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 100 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
KKR KKR & Co. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 25 of 100 | full | elevated |
17 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Financials names rated volatile grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3774).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
BlackRock aims to achieve $400 billion in private markets fundraising by 2030, leveraging strong client engagement and market momentum.
BlackRock aims to grow its technology services and subscription revenue, driven by Aladdin and recent acquisitions.
BlackRock aims to enhance its private credit capabilities through the acquisition of HPS Investment Partners.
Why it matters: Higher EPS shows strong profits and good cost management.
Confirms:Quarterly diluted EPS is over $14.06. This shows strong earnings.
Disproves:Diluted EPS drops below $12.50. This may raise concerns about profits.
Why it matters: Achieving this goal would enhance BlackRock's position in private markets, a key growth area.
Confirms:Private markets fundraising reaches $200 billion by the end of 2026.
Disproves:Fundraising stalls below $150 billion by the end of 2026.
Vanguard's rise poses competitive threat to BlackRock's ETF dominance.
Threatens: Enhance private credit capabilities with HPS acquisition
Job cuts may hinder growth and efficiency objectives.
Vanguard's rise threatens BlackRock's ETF dominance.
Vanguard's move impacts BlackRock's market leadership.
Vanguard's move impacts BlackRock's market leadership.
Threatens: Enhance private credit capabilities with HPS acquisition
Redemption limits indicate potential liquidity issues.
Significant investment in SpaceX aligns with growth strategy.
Entry Into a Material Definitive Agreement. On March 31, 2026, BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) and certain of its subsidiaries entered into Amendment No. 17 (“Amendment No. 17”) to its Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2011, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, dated as of March 30, 2012, Amendment No. 2 thereto, dated as of March 28, 2013, Amendment No. 3 thereto, dated as of March 28, 2014, Amendment No. 4 thereto, dated as of April 2, 2015, Amendment No. 5 thereto…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information included in
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On January 27, 2026, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of BlackRock, Inc. (the “Company”) elected Gregg R. Lemkau to serve as a director of the Board. Mr. Lemkau is joining the Board as an independent director. Mr. Lemkau has served as Co-Chief Executive Officer of BDT & MSD Partners (“BDT & MSD”), a merchant bank with an advisory and investment…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On January 15, 2026, BlackRock, Inc. (the “Company”) reported results of operations for the three months and year ended December 31, 2025. A copy of the earnings release issued by the Company is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K.