Reading ICE? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ICE free→Reading ICE? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ICE free→NYSEFinancialsFinancial Data & Stock ExchangesSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, while management's recent track record has been steady. Earnings quality is neutral, and risk is moderate, with the sector backdrop presenting a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 31% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. The valuation is contingent on guidance changes, as a cut in guidance could negatively impact estimates and the stock. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $141.28. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $140 the market pays 18× p/e — above the 14× p/e peer median but in line with its own 22× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $109 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $177–$211. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 28% near-term growth, ahead of our forecast of about 5%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated strong grew net income 67% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3733).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.28x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=4725).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market and real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.92 → $1.92 (-0.2% / 30d). 0 raised, 2 cut, 12 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 94% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 30.1% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$95.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$213.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,587.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth could signal a slowdown in the financial sector.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth falls below 10% year over year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above 12% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for ICE yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of Form 8-K and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except as may be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. ICE makes references to non-GAAP financial information in the attached press release. A description of the non-GAAP financial information and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP fi…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$177.00 – $211.00 (median $188.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-06-11
Looks more expensive than peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Financial Exchanges & Data.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ICE Intercontinental Exchange | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 47 of 100 | full | moderate |
SPGI S&P Global | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 64 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
CME CME Group | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 44 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
MCO Moody's Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 42 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 22 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=3736).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Continue to manage operating expenses within the guided range for 2026.
Maintain capital expenditures within the guided range for 2026.
Focus on achieving low-to-mid single-digit growth in mortgage technology revenue for 2026.
Why it matters: This exchange offer is important for ICE's debt and cash flow. Finishing it could help financial stability.
Confirms:ICE completes the exchange offer for BK Notes by the June 3, 2024 deadline.
Disproves:The exchange offer fails to meet the deadline or results in low participation.
Why it matters: Higher operating expenses could hurt profits and signal poor cost management. This is a priority for ICE.
Confirms:Q2 GAAP operating costs are above the upper guidance of $1.290 billion.
Disproves:Q2 GAAP operating expenses stay within or below the guidance range.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show how ICE is doing and its growth in mortgage tech revenue.
Confirms:Q2 earnings show mortgage tech revenue grew more than 10% from last year.
Disproves:Mortgage technology revenue growth is below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: This sale is part of getting regulatory approval. It affects ICE's focus and cash flow.
Confirms:ICE finishes the sale of Optimal Blue in the expected 20 days.
Disproves:The divestiture is delayed or fails to close as planned.
Why it matters: High capital spending may mean aggressive growth plans. It could also show poor control.
Confirms one read:Capital spending in Q2 is over $100 million.
Confirms the other:Capital spending is under $50 million in Q2.
Why it matters: Recurring revenue growth shows the stability of ICE's business. It is a sign of customer trust and market position.
Confirms:Recurring revenue grows by more than 10% year over year in Q2.
Disproves:Recurring revenue growth is less than 5% year over year in Q2.
Why it matters: Higher operating expenses can hurt profits. They may also show poor cost control.
Confirms:Operating expenses rise more than 5% from the last quarter.
Disproves:Operating expenses go up by 3% or less from the last quarter.
Why it matters: The results will show how Black Knight stockholders get their merger payment. This affects ICE's finances.
Confirms one read:Final election results show most stockholders chose cash.
Confirms the other:Final results show most chose stock, which leads to proration.
Why it matters: Management's view on capital expenditures will show their plans for growth and investment. This impacts future performance.
Confirms one read:Management says they plan to cut spending on capital projects in Q2.
Confirms the other:Management says they plan to raise spending on capital projects in Q2.
of Form 8-K and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except as may be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. Intercontinental Exchange makes references to non-GAAP financial information in the attached press release. A description of the non-GAAP financial information and a reconciliat…
Other Events. On November 17, 2025, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (“ICE”) completed the public offering and issuance of $600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its 3.950% Senior Notes due 2028 and $650,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its 4.200% Senior Notes due 2031 (together, the “Notes”). The Notes were sold pursuant to an Underwriting Agreement, dated November 5, 2025 (the “Underwriting Agreement”), between ICE and BofA Securities, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Wells Farg…
of Form 8-K and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except as may be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. ICE makes references to non-GAAP financial information in the attached press release. A description of the non-GAAP financial information and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP fi…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. (d) Director Appointment Effective September 18, 2025, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (“ICE”) increased the size of the Board from 10 to 11 directors pursuant to the provisions of ICE’s bylaws and appointed The Rt. Hon. the Lord Hill of Oareford CBE (“Lord Hill”) as a director of ICE. Lord Hill also serves o…