Reading FIZZ? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FIZZ free→Reading FIZZ? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FIZZ free→
NASDAQConsumer StaplesBeverages - Non-alcoholicSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is fragile, reported profits aren't backed by cash. Management's recent track record has been steady, while risk is moderate and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, FIZZ is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 7% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening, as it is priced roughly in line with peers, but recent financials or earnings quality are weakening. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $36.55. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $37 FIZZ trades at 18× p/e, in line with its 17× p/e peer median. Our $34 fair value reflects that, high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 8% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 1%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=1526).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.04x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated fragile grew net income 51% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1037).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, the broad stock market, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated stable grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 47% for the rest of the cohort, n=379).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.60 → $0.62 (+3.1% / 30d). 1 raised, 0 cut, 1 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 0% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 0% of the last 1 guided quarters · -12.0% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$97.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$294.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,361.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Consumer sentiment affects spending. A positive shift could boost sales for National Beverage Corp.
Confirms one read:The CPI report shows inflation is going down. This makes people feel better about spending.
Confirms the other:The CPI report shows inflation is going up. This makes people feel worse about spending.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for FIZZ yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this report, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Soft Drinks & Non-alcoholic Beverages.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
FIZZ National Beverage Corp. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 87 of 100 | full | moderate |
KO Coca-Cola Company (The) | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | expensive | low |
PEP PepsiCo | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | full | low |
MNST Monster Beverage | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 49 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
KDP Keurig Dr Pepper | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 63 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLP
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on innovation to expand distribution and build product velocity.
Continue to monitor tariff-related cost increases and adjust pricing as necessary.
Aim to balance volume with product pricing and margins to meet market expectations.
Why it matters: Successful product launches can boost sales and improve brand image.
Confirms:Sales data shows high demand for new products. PineApple CocoNut is popular after the expo.
Disproves:Sales for new products are weak or below expectations post-expo.
Why it matters: If the company raises prices due to tariffs, it could impact sales volume. Monitoring this will show how well they manage costs without losing customers.
Confirms one read:The company raises prices to cover tariff costs.
Confirms the other:The company keeps prices the same even with higher tariff costs.
Why it matters: This report will show inflation trends that affect consumer spending. It can impact National Beverage's sales.
Confirms one read:CPI shows an increase of more than 0.5% month over month.
Confirms the other:CPI shows a decrease of more than 0.5% month over month.
Why it matters: This report will show how well the company is doing in a tough market. Investors will look for signs of growth or weakness.
Confirms one read:Earnings per share (EPS) beats consensus estimates by more than 10%.
Confirms the other:EPS falls short of consensus estimates by more than 10%.
Why it matters: Strong volume growth would show that the company is recovering from earlier softness. It can boost confidence in their pricing strategy and innovation efforts.
Confirms:Q4 shipment volume increases by more than 7% compared to the previous year.
Disproves:Q4 shipment volume growth is less than 7% or declines year over year.
Why it matters: An increase in revenue growth would signal a positive change in the company's performance. This could help improve investor confidence.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth exceeds 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth remains below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: Successful launches of new products can drive sales and market share. It shows the company's ability to innovate and meet consumer trends.
Confirms:Sales data shows new products like PineApple CocoNut and Strawberry Peach are doing well.
Disproves:Sales data shows new products are not selling well or are below expectations.
Why it matters: This report shows how much consumers are spending. It can affect demand for drinks and National Beverage's sales.
Confirms one read:Retail sales increase by more than 1% month over month.
Confirms the other:Retail sales decrease by more than 1% month over month.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. (b) Cecil D. Conlee, who served on National Beverage Corp.’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) since 2009, advised the Board on or about August 25, 2025 that he did not intend to stand for reelection and would retire from the Board effective as of the Annual Meeting.