Reading PRMB? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PRMB free→Reading PRMB? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PRMB free→
NYSEConsumer StaplesBeverages - Non-alcoholicSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality is robust, meaning cash supports profits. Management's recent track record has been steady. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, PRMB is below typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 60% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified. Rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. If PRMB cuts guidance on the next call, that would be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $24.60. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $25 PRMB trades at 48× p/e — 2.8× the 17× p/e peer median. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $16 fair value is low-confidence here. Analysts: $25–$28. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 57% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=1526).
Over the trailing year it converted 12.70x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated robust grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 51% for the rest of the cohort, n=1037).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the broad stock market, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, the US dollar, Fed net liquidity.
8 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated neutral grew net income 50% of the time over the next year (vs 48% for the rest of the cohort, n=491).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.34 → $0.34 (+0.5% / 30d). 4 raised, 7 cut, 10 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 83% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$164.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$376.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,271.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Earnings will show how well PRIMO BRANDS is managing costs and sales. This is key for future growth.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows revenue growth above 5% year over year.
Confirms the other:Earnings report shows revenue growth below 2% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for PRMB yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this Form 8-K (including Exhibit 99.1) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$25.00 – $28.00 (median $25.50) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-05-11
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Soft Drinks & Non-alcoholic Beverages.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
PRMB PRIMO BRANDS CORP | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 28 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
KO Coca-Cola Company (The) | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | expensive | low |
PEP PepsiCo | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | full | low |
MNST Monster Beverage | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 49 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
KDP Keurig Dr Pepper | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 63 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLP
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management has raised the full-year organic net sales growth outlook.
Stated in 2 of last 2 quarters. Revenue increased from $1,554.1M in 2025-Q4 to $1,626.1M in 2026-Q1. The trajectory shows delivering on the raised sales growth outlook.
“We are raising our full-year organic Net Sales growth outlook.”
“The company’s full year 2026 Organic Net Sales, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Free Cash Flow guidance are available.”
Management has widened the Adjusted EBITDA guidance range for the fiscal year.
Newly stated in 2026-Q1. Operating income increased from $18M in 2025-Q4 to $138M in 2026-Q1, indicating progress towards the widened EBITDA guidance.
“We are widening our Adjusted EBITDA guidance range.”
Management continues to maintain a consistent dividend per share.
Stated in 3 of last 3 quarters. Dividend per share increased from $0.1 in 2025-Q2 to $0.12 in 2026-Q1, showing consistent capital allocation towards dividends.
Why it matters: If revenue growth picks up, it signals a stronger market for PRIMO BRANDS. This could improve investor confidence.
Confirms:Consumer Staples revenue growth moves back toward 6% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth remains below 4% year over year.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On May 15, 2026, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Primo Brands Corporation (the “Company”) increased the size of the Board from 10 to 11 directors, effective May 15, 2026. Additionally, on May 15, 2026, the Board appointed Andrea Brimmer to serve on the Board, effective May 15, 2026, to fill the newly created vacancy resulting from the incre…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On March 31, 2026 (the “Closing Date”), Primo Brands Corporation (the “Company”) entered into an amendment (the “Fifth Amendment”), which amended that certain First Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2021 (as amended prior to the effectiveness of the Fifth Amendment, the “Existing Credit Agreement,” and as further amended by the Fifth Amendment, the “Amended Credit Agreement”), by and among the Company, as the parent borrower, Triton Water…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement. The information set forth in
of this Form 8-K (including Exhibit 99.1) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
“Dividend per share remains at $0.12.”
“Dividend per share is $0.1.”
“Dividend per share is $0.1.”