Terawulf, Inc. (WULF)
NASDAQFinancialsFinancial - Capital MarketsSnapshot 2026-10-29
$12.75-4.99%
Close 2026-10-29 · 1-day change
NASDAQFinancialsFinancial - Capital MarketsSnapshot 2026-10-29
Research Workspace
Put WULF beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Investment Banking & Brokerage is in expansion. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
The reason to own it still holds.
View ThesisRanks in the weakest quality tier of its industry — roughly the bottom 8%, softest on free-cash-flow margins.
View QualityManagement screens weak on capital allocation, earnings delivery, margins, the balance sheet, market reaction to earnings.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is volatile — it swings about 4% on a typical day and fell roughly 61% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskTeraWulf’s contracted high-performance computing leases must stabilize revenue to support its growth case. Revenue growth is not reported here, and the latest quarter missed earnings expectations. WULF trades at 38× sales versus peers’ 2×, despite trading below its own historical multiple. The price reflects less growth than our forecast, though that forecast is not specified here. Our model puts the next-quarter miss probability near 54%. Peer multiples imply a price about 61% above where it trades. This read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-10-29. WULF is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 25 analysts currently covering WULF (as of Oct 2026).
Based on 8 Wall Street analysts offering 12-month price targets for WULF in the last 4 months.
Continue this research
Compare WULF with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WULF Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 1 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-29. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Investment Banking & Brokerage — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put WULF next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Advances: Stabilize revenue with contracted HPC lease model
Long-term Anthropic lease materially validates contracted HPC revenue and strengthens revenue visibility.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-10-29. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
Current $12.75
The last 12 months of price, then the range of analyst 12-month targets from today’s $12.75.
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Bottom 25% on quality vs scored peers
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
Advances: Manage financial obligations with new credit facilities
Expanded $400 million revolving facility supports liquidity and financial-obligation management.
Advances: Stabilize revenue with contracted HPC lease model
Analyst rating supports revenue stabilization through leasing model.
Threatens: Contract 250-500 MW of incremental critical IT capacity annually
Power deal may divert focus from existing objectives.
Advances: Expand hyperscale HPC development with Muskie Data Campus
Exemption supports expansion of hyperscale HPC development.
Target cut indicates potential dilution concerns affecting valuation.
Advances: Expand hyperscale development with Muskie Data Campus
Expansion aligns with growth objective for Muskie Data Campus.
Advances: Expand hyperscale development with Muskie Data Campus
Buy rating supports growth in AI data center expansion.