Reading HOOD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track HOOD free→Reading HOOD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track HOOD free→
NASDAQFinancialsCapital MarketsSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is neutral, and risk is high, while the sector backdrop is a headwind, contributing to a challenging environment. Peer multiples imply a price about 136% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich, as it trades above peer multiples, and the longer horizon does not make that back through growth. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and sector trends, as these could significantly impact the stock's trajectory. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $96.71. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $98 the market pays 46× p/e — above the 19× p/e peer median but in line with its own 41× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $40 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $82–$135. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 145% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 36%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.60x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=4725).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.40 → $0.40 (+0.8% / 30d). 2 raised, 13 cut, 16 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 6 maintained. 69% of analysts rate Buy.
6 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 19.1% above current price.
0 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$305.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$706.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,726.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The earnings report will show if Robinhood is still having financial problems.
Confirms:Earnings results show a revenue decline greater than 10% year over year.
Disproves:Earnings results show revenue growth or a decline less than 10% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for HOOD yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. Workforce Reduction On June 16, 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (the “Company” or “we”) announced a reduction in force as part of its efforts to maintain a high performance culture, further accelerate product velocity, and remain lean and disciplined. The Company is taking this action from a position of business strength, including June month-to-date average daily trading volumes at record levels across equities, options, and prediction markets…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$82.00 – $135.00 (median $105.00) · 19 analysts · as of 2026-06-11
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Investment Banking & Brokerage.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
HOOD Robinhood Markets | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 22 of 100 | expensive | high |
MS Morgan Stanley | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 51 of 100 | full | moderate |
GS Goldman Sachs | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 38 of 100 | full | moderate |
SCHW Charles Schwab Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 87 of 100 | fair | moderate |
IBKR Interactive Brokers | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
11 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated volatile grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3774).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Robinhood plans to invest an additional $100 million to build and support the user interface for Trump Accounts.
Robinhood aims to manage operating expenses with a focus on marketing and growth investments.
Robinhood is expanding its global footprint, securing approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Why it matters: High net deposits show strong customer growth and trust in Robinhood.
Confirms:Net deposits are about $5 billion so far in Q2.
Disproves:Net deposits fall below $4 billion so far. This shows possible customer loss.
Why it matters: A good investment in the Trump Accounts UI could improve customer experience and growth.
Confirms one read:Management says they are making good progress on the Trump Accounts user interface.
Confirms the other:Management says there are delays in the Trump Accounts UI development.
Why it matters: How well Robinhood controls costs will affect its profits and growth.
Confirms one read:Management says operating costs are down by at least 15%.
Confirms the other:Management says operating costs have gone up or stayed the same.
Why it matters: More share buybacks show management's trust in the company's value and plans.
Confirms:Management is buying back shares faster than before.
Disproves:Share buybacks slow down or stop. This shows possible worries about spending.
Why it matters: Higher operating expenses may show problems in managing costs. This can hurt profits.
Confirms:Operating expenses in Q2 are more than $656 million.
Disproves:Operating expenses in Q2 are less than $600 million.
Why it matters: More subscribers mean there is strong demand for premium features and services.
Confirms:Robinhood Gold Subscribers grow by more than 30% year-over-year.
Disproves:Growth in Robinhood Gold Subscribers is less than 30% year-over-year.
Why it matters: More trading means more customer interest. It also shows growth.
Confirms:April trading volumes for equity and options are on track to be the highest of the year.
Disproves:Q2 trading volumes are lower than April's levels. This shows weaker customer interest.
Why it matters: Higher operating expenses may mean trouble in managing costs. This can hurt profits.
Confirms:Operating costs were over $2.825 billion in 2026.
Disproves:Operating costs were under $2.7 billion in 2026.
Why it matters: Shifts in order routing can affect revenue from trading activities.
Confirms one read:Non-directed orders now make up more than 50% of all orders.
Confirms the other:Non-directed orders now make up less than 40% of all orders.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On May 7, 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (the "Company") determined that Jeffrey Pinner, Chief Technology Officer, would be separating from his position, effective the same day. In connection with the separation, Mr. Pinner will be eligible to receive benefits applicable upon a termination without cause under the Company’s Change in Control and Seve…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. Financial Results for the First Quarter of 2026 On April 28, 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (the "Company" or “Robinhood”) issued a press release regarding its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report. As previously announced, Robinhood will host an earnings video call on April 28, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. PT/5:00 p.m. ET. The information furnished with Item 2.02, incl…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Principal Financial Officer / Principal Accounting Officer Transition As previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 10, 2026, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Robinhood Markets, Inc. (the “Company”) appointed Shiv Verma to be its Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), effective as of the close of business on February 6,…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On March 20, 2026, Robinhood Securities, LLC (“RHS”), a subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc. (the “Company” or “Robinhood”), entered into the Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) among RHS, as borrower, the lenders party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, amending and restating the $2.65 billion 364-day senior secured revolving credit facility entered into in March 2025 (the “2025 RHS Cr…