Reading ESRT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ESRT free→Reading ESRT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ESRT free→
NYSEReal EstateReit - DiversifiedSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, while earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been volatile, and the capital stance is capital unfriendly. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, with the company trading above typical compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 33% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. If ESRT cuts guidance on the next call, that could be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $5.36. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $5.30 ESRT trades at 40× p/e — 2.8× the 14× p/e peer median. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $4.07 fair value is low-confidence here. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 30% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 2%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Real Estate names rated neutral grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1968).
Over the trailing year it converted 3.90x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Real Estate names rated robust grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=1399).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 33% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 13.1% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$150.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$343.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,166.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If revenue growth speeds up, it could signal a positive shift in the real estate sector.
Confirms:3-year revenue growth increases above 5% and shows signs of acceleration.
Disproves:3-year revenue growth stays below 5% or continues to decelerate.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for ESRT yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
No upside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
No downside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this Current Report, including Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section. Such information shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, unless it is specifically inc…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Diversified REITs.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ESRT Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 78 of 100 | full | moderate |
WPC W. P. Carey | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 98 of 100 | full | low |
EPRT Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 59 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
LXP Lexington Realty Trust | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 44 of 100 | expensive | low |
GNL Global Net Lease, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 5 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
11 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Real Estate names rated volatile grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3774).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLRE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Continue to provide a stable dividend per share of $0.035 to shareholders.
Stated in 4 of last 4 quarters. The company maintained a dividend per share of $0.035 consistently from 2025-Q1 to 2026-Q1. This reflects a stable capital allocation strategy, with no change in the dividend amount over the period.
“The company maintained a dividend per share of $0.035.”
“Dividend per share was $0.035.”
“Dividend per share was $0.035.”
“Dividend per share was $0.035.”
Focus on managing cash flow from operating activities to support financial stability.
Stated in 4 of last 4 quarters. Cash from operating activities increased from $26.71M in 2025-Q2 to $68.91M in 2026-Q1. This indicates a focus on improving operational cash flow, with significant fluctuations across the quarters.
Maintain a stable net income to ensure financial health and investor confidence.
Stated in 4 of last 4 quarters. Net income decreased significantly from $32.17M in 2025-Q4 to $2.99M in 2026-Q1. This reflects challenges in maintaining net income stability, with a notable decline in the most recent quarter.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On April 15, 2026, Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (the "Company") and Empire State Realty OP, L.P. (the "Operating Partnership"), the operating partnership subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Note Purchase Agreement with the purchasers named therein (the "Purchase Agreement") in connection with a private placement of $130,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Operating Partnership's 5.99% Series M Senior Notes due July 15, 2032 (the "Note…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information set forth under
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On March 15, 2026, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) appointed Jean Sutherland as Chief Accounting Officer and principal accounting officer of the Company and Empire State Realty OP, L.P., the operating partnership of the Company (the “Operating Partnership”), effective on March 16, 2026. Stephe…
of this Current Report, including Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section. Such information shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, unless it is specifically inc…
“Cash from operating activities was $68.91M.”
“Cash from operating activities was $33.90M.”
“Cash from operating activities was $105.29M.”
“Cash from operating activities was $26.71M.”
“Net income was $2.99M.”
“Net income was $32.17M.”
“Net income was $13.65M.”
“Net income was $11.39M.”