Edison International (EIX)
NYSEUtilitiesRegulated ElectricSnapshot 2026-10-30
$58.79-0.99%
Close 2026-10-30 · 1-day change
NYSEUtilitiesRegulated ElectricSnapshot 2026-10-30
Research Workspace
Put EIX beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Electric Utilities is in steady. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
Primary pillar under pressure — Maintain core EPS growth of 5-7% annually: Comparison needs review.
View ThesisRevenue is growing steadily — about 3% over the past year.
View GrowthMiddle-of-the-pack quality for its industry.
View QualityMiddle-of-the-pack management execution.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationModerate volatility — typically moves about 1% a day.
View RiskEIX’s case rests on delivering 5% to 7% annual core EPS growth through 2030. Recent quarterly earnings beat estimates, though the desk shows weak recent financial performance. Its shares trade at 1.2× P/B versus a 2.0× peer median. The price reflects less growth than our forecast. The specific risk is wildfire liability, with California legislative relief uncertain. Our model puts the next-quarter miss probability at 22%. The thesis is on watch because the growth-pillar comparison needs review. Peer multiples imply a price about 28% above where it trades; this read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-10-30. EIX is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 18 analysts currently covering EIX (as of Oct 2026).
Based on 8 Wall Street analysts offering 12-month price targets for EIX in the last 4 months.
Continue this research
Compare EIX with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIX Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 9 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-30. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Electric Utilities — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put EIX next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Advances: Deliver 5% to 7% core EPS growth from 2025 through 2030
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-10-30. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
Current $58.79
The last 12 months of price, then the range of analyst 12-month targets from today’s $58.79.
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Bottom 25% on quality vs scored peers
A second lens on the 12-month fair value: for companies that score high on measured quality (profitability, balance-sheet safety, earnings stability), this read trusts more of today's profit margins instead of averaging them toward their multi-year history the way the headline number does. Shown alongside the fair value above, not in place of it. A diagnostic, not a price target or a buy/sell signal.
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
Reaffirmed 2026 core EPS guidance and capex plan support stated growth and investment objectives.
Jury trial over alleged equipment involvement adds wildfire liability and recovery uncertainty.
Threatens: Execute wildfire mitigation and recovery programs
Short seller's claim raises concerns about wildfire liability.
Threatens: Execute wildfire mitigation and recovery programs
Wildfire policy uncertainty impacts mitigation program execution.
Threatens: Execute wildfire mitigation and recovery programs
Downgrade reflects concerns over wildfire liability impacting objectives.
Dividend stability amid stock decline raises growth concerns.
Threatens: Execute wildfire mitigation and recovery programs
Wildfire reform stall impacts mitigation program execution.
Threatens: Execute wildfire mitigation and recovery programs
Wildfire liability issues hinder mitigation efforts and recovery programs.
