Evergy (EVRG)
NASDAQUtilitiesRegulated ElectricSnapshot 2026-10-29
NASDAQUtilitiesRegulated ElectricSnapshot 2026-10-29
Research Workspace
Put EVRG beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Electric Utilities is in steady. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
Primary pillar under pressure — No major negative regulatory changes: Qualitative: 1 adverse legislative pushback event vs 0 target.
View ThesisRevenue is growing steadily — about 4% over the past year.
View GrowthRanks in the weakest quality tier of its industry — roughly the bottom 41%, softest on free-cash-flow margins.
View QualityMiddle-of-the-pack management execution.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationRelatively steady — typically moves about 1% a day.
View RiskEVRG’s case rests on steady recent performance and cash-backed profits, supported by repeated earnings beats. The latest quarter beat consensus, though the desk provides no revenue-growth figures. EVRG trades at 2.0× P/B versus a 2.0× peer median and 1.9× its history. The price reflects less growth than our forecast, though expectations look modest. An adverse legislative pushback event pressures a primary thesis pillar. Our model puts the next-quarter miss probability near 22%. Peer multiples imply a price about 13% below where it trades. The thesis is on watch; this read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-10-30. EVRG is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 16 analysts currently covering EVRG (as of Oct 2026).
Based on 5 Wall Street analysts offering 12-month price targets for EVRG in the last 4 months.
Continue this research
Compare EVRG with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVRG Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 10 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-30. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Electric Utilities — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put EVRG next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Advances: Advance large customer electric service agreements
Management's earnings-call discussion updates large-customer agreements and the growth outlook.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-10-30. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
Current $85.93
The last 12 months of price, then the range of analyst 12-month targets from today’s $85.93.
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Below average on quality vs scored peers
A second lens on the 12-month fair value: for companies that score high on measured quality (profitability, balance-sheet safety, earnings stability), this read trusts more of today's profit margins instead of averaging them toward their multi-year history the way the headline number does. Shown alongside the fair value above, not in place of it. A diagnostic, not a price target or a buy/sell signal.
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.

Advances: Advance large customer electric service agreements
The transcript provides management's direct update on customer agreements and growth plans.

Advances: Advance large customer electric service agreements
Expected 2028 EPS growth and targeting another 2026 agreement support the customer-growth strategy.

Advances: Advance large customer electric service agreements
Earnings-call highlights indicate updates to data-center demand and large-customer growth.
Advances: Advance large customer electric service agreements
Slides cite a data-center pipeline supporting 12% rate-base growth, a significant growth catalyst.

Legislative pushback could impact competitive bidding.
Focus on delivering financial targets
Naming a finance chief supports continuity in financial execution, with limited thesis impact.
Focus on delivering financial targets
The finance leadership succession is relevant to financial execution but does not change targets.