Reading DUK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DUK free→Reading DUK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DUK free→
NYSEUtilitiesUtilities - Regulated ElectricSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality and management's track record are neutral. Risk is low, while the sector backdrop is a headwind, indicating challenges in the broader market. Peer multiples imply a price about 6% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. The outlook hinges on whether DUK cuts guidance on the next call, as that could negatively impact estimates and the stock. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $126.05. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $125 DUK trades at 19× p/e, below its 21× p/e peer median. Our $135 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $132–$142. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 7% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 12%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Utilities names rated strong grew net income 61% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=906).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.27x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Utilities names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1075).
Most sensitive to real (inflation-adjusted) rates and long-term interest rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, the broad stock market, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.25 → $1.25 (+0.0% / 30d). 1 raised, 3 cut, 14 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 46% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 11.0% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$72.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$149.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,088.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
As of June 16, 2026, the signal label changed to mixed, indicating a shift in overall sentiment. The sector backdrop fell, suggesting a more challenging environment for the company. Risk remained low, indicating stability in the stock's risk profile.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Reaffirming guidance shows confidence in meeting growth targets. It signals stability in earnings.
Confirms:Management reaffirms the 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $6.55 to $6.80.
Disproves:Management cuts the 2026 adjusted EPS guidance to below $6.55.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Threatens: Maintain affordable energy rates
Regulatory scrutiny could impact cost objectives and rates.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
. 104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document). SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION /s/ ABIGAIL L. MOTSINGER Abigail L. Motsinger Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller Dated: May 5, 2026
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$132.00 – $142.00 (median $139.00) · 9 analysts · as of 2026-06-02
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Electric Utilities.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
DUK Duke Energy | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 80 of 100 | fair | low |
SO Southern Company | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 71 of 100 | full | low |
CEG Constellation Energy | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 56 of 100 | fair | elevated |
AEP American Electric Power | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 48 of 100 | full | low |
ETR Entergy | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 41 of 100 | full | low |
7 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Utilities names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=5004).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLU
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Duke Energy aims for a long-term adjusted EPS growth rate of 5% to 7% through 2030.
Duke Energy is executing a $103 billion capital plan over five years to drive growth.
Duke Energy is focused on keeping energy rates affordable for customers.
Why it matters: A higher effective tax rate affects profits. It may also slow EPS growth.
Confirms:The effective tax rate rises above 17.6% in Q2.
Disproves:The effective tax rate falls below 17.6% in Q2.
Why it matters: Higher O&M expenses may show cost pressures. This can affect earnings.
Confirms:O&M expenses exceed $1.5 billion in Q2.
Disproves:O&M expenses remain below $1.5 billion in Q2.
Why it matters: Progress on this plan is crucial for achieving long-term growth targets.
Confirms one read:Management says there is good progress on the capital plan by Q3.
Confirms the other:Management says there are delays or issues with the capital plan.
Why it matters: Aligning EPS growth with the 5% to 7% target is crucial for investor confidence.
Confirms one read:Quarterly EPS growth meets or exceeds 5% year-over-year.
Confirms the other:Quarterly EPS growth is less than 5% compared to last year.
Advances: $103 billion five-year capital plan
Increases funding for capital plan, supporting growth objectives.
Advances: $103 billion five-year capital plan
Increases funding for capital plan, supporting growth objectives.
Increased demand may pressure energy rates.
Increased demand may pressure energy rates.
Advances: $103 billion five-year capital plan
Federal grants support capital plan and growth objectives.
Advances: $103 billion five-year capital plan
Federal grants support capital plan and growth objectives.
Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets. As previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on July 29, 2025 by Duke Energy Corporation (“Duke Energy”) and Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., a North Carolina corporation (“Piedmont”) and wholly owned subsidiary of Duke Energy, Piedmont entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Piedmont and Spire Tennessee Inc., a Delaware corporation and successor…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On March 16, 2026, Duke Energy Corporation (the “Corporation”), Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Duke Energy Florida, LLC, Duke Energy Indiana, LLC, Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc., Duke Energy Ohio, Inc., Duke Energy Progress, LLC, and Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., entered into an Amendment No. 3 and Consent (the “Amendment”) to amend the existing Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 18, 2022, among the Corporation and each of such s…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On March 6, 2026, Duke Energy Corporation (the “Company”) entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement dated March 6, 2026 (the “Equity Distribution Agreement”) with Barclays Capital Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp., BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, BofA Securities, Inc., BTIG, LLC, CIBC World Markets Corp., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citizens JMP Securities, LLC, Fifth Third Securities, Inc., Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Huntington Securities, Inc.…
Forward-Looking Information This document includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by terms and phrases such as "anticipate," "believe," "intend," "estimate," "expect," "continue," "should," "could," "may," "plan," "project," "predict," "will," "potential," "forecast," "targ…