HF Sinclair (DINO)
NYSEEnergyOil & Gas Refining & MarketingSnapshot 2026-10-29
NYSEEnergyOil & Gas Refining & MarketingSnapshot 2026-10-29
Research Workspace
Put DINO beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Energy is in expansion. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
The reason to own it still holds.
View ThesisRevenue is contracting — down about 29% over the past year.
View GrowthMiddle-of-the-pack quality for its industry.
View QualityMiddle-of-the-pack management execution.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationModerate volatility — typically moves about 2% a day.
View RiskDINO’s refining strength supports enterprise-wide growth, with revenue growth slowing from 53% to 50% year over year. Q3 2026 revenue still grew 50%, and non-GAAP earnings beat consensus by 43.6%. DINO trades at 5.9× P/E versus the 21.5× peer median; its own historical multiple was 11.3×. The price reflects less growth than our forecast, leaving the valuation gap tied to the company’s growth outlook. Fragile cash backing and unsteady management threaten confidence in reported profits. Our model puts the next-quarter miss probability near 15%. Peer multiples imply a price about 46% above where it trades; our read remains intact. This read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-10-30. DINO is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 17 analysts currently covering DINO (as of Oct 2026).
Based on 8 Wall Street analysts offering 12-month price targets for DINO in the last 4 months.
Continue this research
Compare DINO with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DINO Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 12 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-30. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put DINO next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Advances: Drive enterprise-wide growth and transformation
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-10-30. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
Current $115.00
The last 12 months of price, then the range of analyst 12-month targets from today’s $115.00.
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Top 10% on quality vs scored peers
A second lens on the 12-month fair value: for companies that score high on measured quality (profitability, balance-sheet safety, earnings stability), this read trusts more of today's profit margins instead of averaging them toward their multi-year history the way the headline number does. Shown alongside the fair value above, not in place of it. A diagnostic, not a price target or a buy/sell signal.
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
Planned 35,000-bpd capacity expansion supports growth, though FID and startup remain years away.

Advances: Drive enterprise-wide growth and transformation
Record profit supports growth and profitability, while CEO appointment adds leadership transition uncertainty.

Advances: Drive enterprise-wide growth and transformation
Strength in refining supports enterprise-wide growth objective.

Advances: Share repurchase agreement with REH Advisors
Share buyback aligns with capital allocation strategy.

Threatens: Drive enterprise-wide growth and transformation
Spinoff may hinder growth and transformation efforts.

New acting CFO may create uncertainty in management.
Downgrade indicates potential valuation issues.
Concerns over valuation could impact investor confidence.