Reading ALCO? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ALCO free→Reading ALCO? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ALCO free→
NASDAQConsumer StaplesFarm ProductsSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, and it has a capital-friendly stance. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, with ALCO trading below typical compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 155% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich, as it trades above peer multiples, and the longer horizon does not make that back through growth. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $40.20. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $40, ALCO's earnings are too small for P/E to mean much; on sales it trades at 8× p/s (8.2× the 1× p/s peer median). At a normal multiple the price implies ~155% near-term growth vs our ~3% forecast. That gap is an optionality premium a financial-multiple model can't price — our $16 fair value covers only the as-is business, low confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 155% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 3%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 3 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated weak grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=1144).
Over the trailing year it converted -0.14x of net income into operating cash flow.
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, the broad stock market, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
9 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated neutral grew net income 50% of the time over the next year (vs 48% for the rest of the cohort, n=491).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $-0.44 → $-0.73 (-65.9% / 30d). 0 raised, 1 cut, 1 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 50% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$88.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$248.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,243.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Retail sales data affects how much people spend. This can change Alico's performance.
Confirms one read:Advance Monthly Retail Trade Report shows retail sales growth above 0.5% month over month.
Confirms the other:Retail sales growth is negative or below 0.5% month over month.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for ALCO yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this Report (including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly provided by specific reference in such a filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Agricultural Products & Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ALCO Alico, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 21 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
ADM Archer Daniels Midland | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | full | moderate |
BG Bunge Global | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 98 of 100 | fair | moderate |
DAR Darling Ingredients | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 60 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
INGR Ingredion | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLP
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
No qualifying priorities for this snapshot. Check back after the next refresh.
Why it matters: Earnings results show how well Alico is doing financially and in the market.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows a profit or less loss.
Confirms the other:Earnings report shows more losses or worse financial numbers.
Why it matters: If revenue growth picks up, it may signal a positive shift in the sector's maturity phase.
Confirms:Q3 revenue growth exceeds 4% year over year.
Disproves:Q3 revenue growth remains below 4% year over year.
of this Report (including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto) and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly provided by specific reference in such a filing.
of this Report (including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly provided by specific reference in such a filing.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On October 27, 2025, the Corkscrew Grove Stewardship District (the “Stewardship District”), a special district formed to facilitate financing and development of community infrastructure within its boundaries, entered into a Locally Funded Agreement (the “Agreement”) with the State of Florida Department of Transportation (“FDOT”). As previously announced, the Stewardship District was established in June 2025 and it will assist Alico, Inc. (the “Compa…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On September 29, 2025, Alico, Inc. (the “Company”) closed a refinancing transaction pursuant to which 734 Citrus Holdings, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, 734 LMC Groves, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, 734 Co-Op Groves, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, 734 BLP Groves, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and 734 Harvest, LLC, a Florida limited liability company repaid in full all outstanding borrowings under that ce…