Reading SM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SM free→Reading SM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SM free→
NYSEEnergyOil & Gas E&pSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits, but risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 20% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. If sector bellwethers like COP, EOG, and OXY keep beating earnings and guiding higher, the Energy sector momentum should keep lifting SM and other Energy names. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $28.07. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $28 SM trades at 5× p/e, below its 12× p/e peer median. Our $62 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $24–$55. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 54% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 8%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 0 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Energy names rated neutral grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=1255).
Over the trailing year it converted 16.55x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Energy names rated robust grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 35% for the rest of the cohort, n=602).
Most sensitive to the US dollar and the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.91 → $2.03 (+6.6% / 30d). 5 raised, 4 cut, 14 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 57% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 26.1% above current price.
0 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
Transition story with positive analyst positioning (often a turnaround setup).
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$212.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$523.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,814.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Completing the redemption of the 2026 Senior Notes will reduce debt and interest costs.
Confirms:Redemption of all $819 million of 2026 Senior Notes is completed by June 1, 2026.
Disproves:Redemption is delayed or not completed by the planned date.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for SM yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
No upside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
No downside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On May 21, 2026, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of SM Energy Company (the “ Company ”) amended and restated the Change of Control Executive Severance Agreement for Elizabeth A. McDonald, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, effective as of January 30, 2026 (“ Change of Control Agreement ”). Pursuant to the Chan…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$24.00 – $55.00 (median $31.50) · 8 analysts · as of 2026-05-21
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
SM SM Energy Company | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 83 of 100 | fair | elevated |
COP ConocoPhillips | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
EOG EOG Resources | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 95 of 100 | full | moderate |
OXY Occidental Petroleum | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 85 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
FANG Diamondback Energy | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 55 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
17 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Energy names rated volatile grew net income 45% of the time over the next year (vs 48% for the rest of the cohort, n=252).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on integrating the Civitas merger with a raised synergy target of $375 million in annualized run-rate savings.
Newly stated in 2026-Q1. SM Energy raised its synergy target to $375 million, with $300 million actioned to date. The focus on integration is evident, but financials show a net loss of $335 million in 2026-Q1, indicating limited progress in overall profitability.
“SM raised total synergy target to $375 million in annualized run-rate savings, with approximately $300 million actioned to date.”
Reaffirm full-year 2026 capital expenditure guidance of $2.65-$2.85 billion.
Newly stated in 2026-Q1. SM Energy reaffirmed its capital expenditure guidance of $2.65-$2.85 billion for 2026. Despite maintaining this guidance, the company reported a net loss of $335 million in 2026-Q1, suggesting challenges in achieving profitability.
“SM maintained full-year 2026 capital expenditure guidance of $2.65-$2.85 billion.”
Raise full-year 2026 production guidance to 410-430 MBoe/d, reflecting strong first quarter execution.
Newly stated in 2026-Q1. SM Energy raised its production guidance to 410-430 MBoe/d for 2026, reflecting strong execution in the first quarter. However, the net loss of $335 million in 2026-Q1 indicates financial challenges despite increased production targets.
“SM increased its full-year 2026 production guidance to 410-430 MBoe/d.”
Focus on reducing debt by redeeming outstanding notes.
Continue to provide consistent dividend payments to shareholders.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show if the company can recover from the recent earnings miss.
Confirms:The Q2 earnings report shows profits that are higher than what analysts expected. This suggests recovery.
Disproves:The Q2 earnings report shows another miss. This confirms ongoing financial struggles.
Why it matters: Reducing debt shows a focus on financial health and smart spending.
Confirms:Look for news on debt payoffs over $100 million next quarter.
Disproves:No further debt reduction actions announced in the next quarter.
Why it matters: The divestiture is expected to strengthen the balance sheet and improve cash flow.
Confirms:Net cash flow goes up a lot after the $950 million South Texas sale.
Disproves:Cash flow remains flat or declines after the divestiture.
Why it matters: Confirming dividend payments shows the company is stable. It shows care for shareholders.
Confirms:Management confirms the date and amount for the next dividend payment.
Disproves:Management suspends or cuts the dividend. This signals financial trouble.
Why it matters: Keeping or raising dividends shows strong cash flow and care for shareholders.
Confirms:Announcement of a dividend increase above $0.22 per share in the next quarter.
Disproves:Announcement of a dividend cut or suspension in the next quarter.
Why it matters: Better free cash flow shows good capital management. It also shows better efficiency.
Confirms:Adjusted free cash flow for Q2 2026 is higher than $20 million.
Disproves:Adjusted free cash flow for Q2 2026 is lower than $20 million.
Why it matters: Hitting or beating this goal shows strong performance. It helps support future growth.
Confirms:Reported production in Q2 2026 is at least 450 MBoe/d.
Disproves:Production reported for Q2 2026 is below 435 MBoe/d.
Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement. On June 1, 2026, SM Energy Company (“ Company ”) paid $419,235,000 to redeem all of the aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 6.75% Senior Notes due 2026 (the “ 2026 Senior Notes ”), plus accrued and unpaid interest, pursuant to the terms of the Indenture, dated as of May 21, 2015 (the “ Base Indenture ”), by and between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, (including its successor in interest, U.S. Bank Trust Company, Nationa…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. In accordance with General Instruction B.2. of Form 8-K, the following information, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“ Exchange Act ”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall such information and exhibits be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, exce…
Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets. As previously announced, on February 17, 2026, SM Energy Company (the “ Company ”) entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “ PSA ”) with Caturus Energy, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and, solely for the purposes of Section 7.8 thereof, Caturus Holdco, LLC, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell all of its rights, titles and interests in certain producing and non-producing assets encompassing approximately 61,000 net…
Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement. On May 11, 2026, SM Energy Company (“Company”) paid $400 million to redeem all of the aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 5.000% Senior Notes due 2026 (“2026 Senior Notes”), plus accrued and unpaid interest, pursuant to the terms of the Indenture, dated as of October 13, 2021, among the Company (as successor in interest to Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.), the guarantors party thereto and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (as successor in i…