ORAGENICS INC (OGEN)
AMEXHealth CareBiotechnologySnapshot 2026-09-14
$0.50+4.39%
Close 2026-09-14 · 1-day change
AMEXHealth CareBiotechnologySnapshot 2026-09-14
Research Workspace
Put OGEN beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Biotechnology is in steady. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
Primary pillar broken — Maintain operating losses near -$2.2M net income and cash flow: metric not reported.
View ThesisManagement screens weak on capital allocation, margins.
View ManagementThis stock is highly volatile — it swings about 2% on a typical day and fell roughly 66% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskOGEN's growth depends on maintaining its recovery in financial performance. The company recently climbed back into the top half of its industry. Revenue growth has been steady, and the latest results confirm this trend. OGEN trades at 30× price-to-sales, above the peer median of 12×. This suggests the price reflects expected growth fairly well. The primary risk is ongoing operating losses, which are around -$2.2M. Peer multiples imply a price about 55% above where it trades. This read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-09-14. OGEN is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Continue this research
Compare OGEN with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Free account required to save the handoff. No credit card.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGEN Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-09-14. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Biotechnology — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put OGEN next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Advancement in drug trial supports product development goals.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-09-14. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Bottom 25% on quality vs scored peers
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.