Reading MLM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MLM free→Reading MLM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MLM free→NYSEMaterialsBuilding MaterialsSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is fragile, indicating that reported profits are not well supported by cash. Management's recent track record has been volatile, and the capital stance is capital unfriendly, which may raise concerns. The sector backdrop is a headwind, suggesting challenges in the broader market. Peer multiples imply a price about 26% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $603.59. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $589 MLM trades at 31× p/e, in line with its 25× p/e peer median. Our $484 fair value reflects that, medium confidence. Analysts: $556–$785. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 22% near-term growth, ahead of our forecast of about 3%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Crisis) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Materials names rated neutral grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1462).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.71x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Materials names rated fragile grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=988).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $5.15 → $4.98 (-3.3% / 30d). 0 raised, 12 cut, 15 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 61% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target -2.6% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 0% of the last 1 guided quarters · -98.3% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$120.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$283.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,468.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: GDP growth affects demand for construction materials. Strong growth can lead to increased sales for the company.
Confirms:GDP growth is above 2% for Q1 2026. This shows strong economic activity.
Disproves:GDP growth is below 1% for Q1 2026. This suggests an economic slowdown.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for MLM yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On May 14, 2026, the shareholders of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (the “Company”) voted to approve the Martin Marietta Amended and Restated Stock-Based Award Plan (the “Plan”). A description of the Plan is included as Appendix C in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders held on May 14, 2026, filed with th…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$556.00 – $785.00 (median $696.00) · 10 analysts · as of 2026-06-02
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Construction Materials.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
MLM Martin Marietta Materials | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 57 of 100 | full | moderate |
CRH CRH plc | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 45 of 100 | fair | moderate |
VMC Vulcan Materials Company | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 46 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
CX CEMEX SAB DE CV | — | — | moderate |
EXP Eagle Materials | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 92 of 100 | full | moderate |
17 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Materials names rated volatile grew net income 61% of the time over the next year (vs 51% for the rest of the cohort, n=235).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLB
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Reaffirmed full-year 2026 Adjusted EBITDA guidance of $2.43 billion at the midpoint.
Reaffirmed full-year 2026 revenue guidance of $7.16 billion at the midpoint.
Maintain capital expenditures within the guidance range of $550 to $600 million for 2026.
Why it matters: How the company spends money can affect growth and profits. This matters to investors.
Confirms one read:Management says capital spending is down but growth targets stay the same.
Confirms the other:Management says capital spending is up without clear plans for growth.
Why it matters: Growth in shipments shows strong demand. This is important for stable revenue.
Confirms:Aggregates shipments increase year over year by more than 10% in Q2 2026.
Disproves:Aggregates shipments decline year over year or grow less than 5% in Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Confirming revenue guidance shows trust in sales growth. This can help stock feelings.
Confirms:Management states that 2026 revenue guidance is still valid in the next earnings update.
Disproves:Management lowers the 2026 revenue guidance. This means they expect weaker sales.
Why it matters: Closing this deal would improve Martin Marietta's market position and growth.
Confirms:The acquisition of New Frontier Materials closes in the second half of 2026.
Disproves:The deal faces delays or rules that stop closure in 2026.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 30, 2026, the Company announced financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026. The press release, dated April 30, 2026, is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and is incorporated by reference herein.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On April 27, 2026, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (the “Company”) announced that the Company has appointed Christopher W. Samborski, to serve as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, effective as of May 1, 2026 (the “Effective Date”). Mr. Samborski, age 45, joined the Company in August 2018 and currently serves as Pre…
COMPLETION OF ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF ASSETS On February 23, 2026, pursuant to the Equity and Asset Exchange Agreement, dated as of August 3, 2025 (the “ Exchange Agreement ”), by and between Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., a North Carolina corporation (“ Martin Marietta ”), and Quikrete Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ Quikrete ”), (a) Martin Marietta transferred to Quikrete Martin Marietta’s assets primarily related to its cement and ready-mix concrete operations at its Midl…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 11, 2026, the Company announced financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2025. The press release, dated February 11, 2026, is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and is incorporated by reference herein.